JUDGEMENT
L.NAGESWARA RAO,J. -
(1.)Dafadar Kartar Singh, the Respondent-herein was tried by the Summary Court Martial for a civil offence of
house breaking by night. He was found guilty of the
charge and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for
seven months apart from dismissal from service and
reduction in the ranks. The conviction was set aside by
the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chandigarh
(for short, "the Tribunal"). The Tribunal directed that the
Respondent shall be deemed to be in service w.e.f.
10.11.1999 till the date of his superannuation in the rank of Dafadar. He was also held to be entitled to all
allowances for the said period and pensionery benefits.
These Appeals are directed against the said judgment of
the Tribunal.
(2.)The Respondent was serving in the 74 th Armoured Regiment at Panagarh, West Bengal in the year 1998.
He was residing in the residential quarters at the SBI
Lines. Sowar Kishore Kumar Yadav who was also
staying in the same residential quarters was
hospitalized on 14.10.1998 due to which his wife Smt.
Sudesh was staying alone in the residential quarters.
As Smt. Sudesh was alone, her neighbor's son- Master
Jaynendra alias Bittoo was requested to stay with her.
Around midnight of 14/15.10.1998, Smt. Sudesh heard
some sound of breaking of a bottle from the toilet of her
house and noticed the movement of a person in the
toilet. She saw a person wearing a light coloured
sleeveless vest and a kuchha coming out of the toilet.
He switched off the lights in the lobby and the toilet.
Smt. Sudesh tried to wake up Bittoo. In the meanwhile,
the intruder walked up towards the door of the bed
room and stood in the door-way. She could see the
intruder in the light of the bed room. He switched off
the light of the bed room and came inside the bed
room. Bittoo woke up and saw the intruder and started
screaming "Koi Aadmi Hai". Then Smt. Sudeh also
screamed at which the intruder ran out of the bed room
closing and bolting the bed room from outside. Smt.
Sudesh heard Smt. Mithilesh, mother of Bittoo,
enquiring from outside as to what was the matter to
which Bittoo replied that somebody has come into the
house. Thereafter, people gathered at the main
entrance and opened the locked room and entered
inside the bed room and started enquiring about the
incident. Some people also inspected the toilet to find
out as to how the intruder sneaked into the house. Smt.
Sudesh came out of the house and saw Lance Naik A.
Hussain, Havildar K.K. Thakaran and Naik Ramesh Yadav
amongst other people who gathered outside the
quarters. She immediately recognized the intruder
standing along with other people who gathered there
and pointed to the Respondent saying that he was the
man who broke into the house. Risaldar Pritam Singh
visited the house of Sowar Kishore Kumar Yadav to
investigate the incident at 1400 hrs. on 15.10.1998 on
receipt of complaint of house breaking. He spoke to
Smt. Sudesh who explained to him the details. He
inspected the window of the toilet and found the lower
portion of the window had been removed and
was lying near the drain block and the frame of the
window was broken. The broken ends of the detached
portion of the window lying on the ground indicated that
it was broken recently. He inspected the toilet to find
that the bottle which was containing acid was lying
broken in the toilet. He then called the official
photographer and the photographs of Respondent and
the site were taken. The Respondent had abrasions on
his right upper arm on the lateral side and the left upper
arm on lateral side.
(3.)The Court of Inquiry was held to investigate the charge levelled by Smt. Sudesh against the Respondent.
Eight witnesses were examined and the Court of Inquiry
recorded a finding that Respondent broke into the house
of Smt. Sudesh. However, as the intention of the house
breaking was not established, the Court of Inquiry
recommended that disciplinary action be initiated
against the Respondent. The Respondent was medically
examined by Captain C.P. Patel, Army Doctor, on
18.10.1998 who found abrasions on his arms which were three to four days old. Summary of evidence was
recorded in the presence of the Respondent in terms of
Rule 23 of the Army Rules and a charge sheet was laid
against the Respondent for committing an offence
under Section 69 of the Army Act contrary to Section
456 of the Indian Penal Code ("IPC") for house breaking by night. The GOC 15 Infantry Division gave sanction
for trial of the Respondent by Summary Court Martial in
terms of Section 120 of the Army Act, 1950. The
Commanding Officer, 74 Armoured Regiment conducted
the Summary Court Martial between 11.08.1999 and
10.11.1999. The Respondent pleaded not guilty of the charge. Six prosecution witnesses were examined. The
Respondent gave statement in his defence at the trial
and has also examined two defence witnesses. Two
Court witnesses were also summoned and examined. At
the conclusion of the trial, the Summary Court Martial
found the Respondent guilty of the charge and
sentenced him to reduction in the ranks, dismissal from
service and rigorous imprisonment for seven months.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.