JUDGEMENT
INDU MALHOTRA, J. -
(1.) The Petitioner has filed an Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator on behalf of Respondent
No. 1 - Doordarshan, in an international commercial
arbitration.
(2.) The Petitioner - Company and Respondent No. 2 entered into a Contract dated 08.03.2010 with
Respondent No. 1 - Doordarshan. The Contract
contains an arbitration clause, which reads as under :
"8.2 Arbitration: In the case of dispute arising upon or in relation to or in connection with the Contract between HB and the Entity, which has not been settled amicably, any Party can refer the dispute for Arbitration under (Indian) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Such disputes shall be referred to an Arbitral Tribunal consisting on 3 (three) arbitrators, one each to be appointed by HB and the Entity, the third arbitrator shall be chosen by the two arbitrators so appointed by the Parties which shall act as Presiding Arbitrator. In case of failure of the two arbitrators, appointed by the Parties to reach a consensus regarding the appointment of the third arbitrator within a period of Thirty (3) days from the date of appointment of the two arbitrators, the Presiding Arbitrator shall be appointed by the Secretary of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and any statutory modification or reenactment thereof shall apply to these Arbitration proceedings.
8.3 Arbitration proceedings shall be held in India at New Delhi and the language of the Arbitration proceedings and that of all documents and communications between the Parties shall be English. The law as applicable in India shall govern the rights and obligations of the parties."
(3.) Disputes arose between the parties, which led to the invocation of the arbitration clause on 14.01.2019 by
the Petitioner - Company. The Petitioner - Company
nominated its arbitrator on 28.02.2019 in terms of
the agreement. However, Respondent No. 1 -
Doordarshan failed to nominate an arbitrator.
Consequently, the Petitioner - Company has filed the present Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator by the Court on behalf of Respondent No. 1 - Doordarshan. ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.