COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM AMRITSAR Vs. AJAY KUMAR
LAWS(SC)-2009-5-32
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on May 08,2009

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI,COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, AMRITSAR Appellant
VERSUS
AJAY KUMAR AND CO,AMC COATED FABRICS PVT. LTD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J. - (1.) Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court upholding the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (in short 'CESTAT') dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant.
(2.) Background facts in a nutshell are as follows: Appellant acquired and/or purchased transferable Duty Entitlement Pass Book (in short the 'DEPB') including licenses dated 6.11.2000 and 20.11.2000 issued in the name of M/s. Parker Industries. By show cause notices dated 30.5.2002, 12.6.2002 and 26.7.2002 appellant was called upon to show cause why an amount of Rs. 12,45, 174/- could not be recovered and demanded in terms of proviso to Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the 'Act'). Noticee denied the allegations. However, Commissioner of Customs, Amritsar confirmed the demand along with interest and penalty. Same was held to be jointly payable by the original license holder and licensee. It was held that goods were liable in confiscation under Section 111 of the Act. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by respondent holding the demand to be barred by limitation. The High Court upheld the view.
(3.) In this appeal challenge is to the aforesaid conclusions. Learned Counsel for the respondent pointed out that no role was ascribed to it in the show cause notice.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.