JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal is directed against the order dated 9 th January, 2006
whereby the Calcutta High Court referred the dispute arising between
the parties herein to the sole arbitration of Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.K.
Basu a retired Judge of Calcutta High Court, with a request to him to
adjudicate upon and decide the dispute between the parties. The
aforesaid order came to be passed on an application filed by the
respondents herein under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). By filing
the said application, the respondents prayed for appointment of an
arbitrator relying on the alleged arbitration agreement being clause
No. 14.
(2.) The parties entered into an excavation contract whereby the
respondents undertook to carry out certain works on behalf of the
appellant herein. In the contract signed by the parties there is a clause
being clause No. 14 with the caption "Settlement of
Disputes/Arbitration". Part of the said clause which is relevant to the
context of this case is reproduced hereunder :
".......It is incumbent upon the contractor to avoid
litigations and disputes during the course of execution.
However, if such disputes take place between the contractor
and the department, effort shall be made first to settle the
disputes through committees at different levels made for this
purpose by the company."
(3.) The aforesaid clause 14 in the Agreement, however, was scored out
and the same was replaced by another clause being clause No. 14.
When the parties entered into the agreement and signed the agreement
what remains in the agreement was clause No. 14 with the caption
"Arbitration with regard to the commercial disputes between the
Public Sector Enterprises inter se and Public Sector Enterprises and
Government Departments." It reads as follows :
"ARBITRATION WITH REGARD TO THE
COMMERCIAL DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PUBLIC
SECTOR ENTERPRISES INTER SE AND BETWEEN
THE PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISES AND
GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS."
"In the event of any dispute of difference relating to the
interpretation and application of the provisions of the
commercial terms of the contract such dispute or difference
shall be referred by either party to the arbitration, to one of
the arbitrators in the Department of Public Enterprises, to be
nominated by the Secretary to the Government of India
incharge of the BUREAU OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES.
The Arbitration Act, 1940 shall not be applicable to the
arbitration under this clause. The award of the arbitrator
shall be binding upon the parties to the dispute, provided
however, any party aggrieved by such award, may make
further reference for setting aside or revision of the award to
the Law Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of
Law & Justice, Government of India. Upon such reference,
the dispute shall be decided by the Law Secretary or the
Special Secretary/Additional Secretary when so authorised
by the Law Secretary, whose decision shall bind the parties
finally and conclusively. The parties to the dispute will
share equally the cost of arbitration, as intimated by the
arbitrator.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.