JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The appellant was engaged as a daily wager by the
Respondent No. 1, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board
on September 1, 1995. He worked with the Respondent No. 1
upto July 18, 1996. Thereafter, his services came to an end.
During his employment, the appellant was paid consolidated
wages @ Rs. 1,498/- per month. The appellant raised the
industrial dispute contending that his services were retrenched
illegally in violation of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (for short, 'the Act, 1947'). He claimed reinstatement with
continuity of service and full back wages.
(3.) The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Panipat, after recording evidence and hearing the parties
held that the appellant had worked for more than 240 days in
the year preceding the date of termination and that the
Respondent No. 1 violated the provisions of Section 25F of the
Act 1947 by not giving him notice, pay in lieu of notice and
retrenchment compensation before his termination. The Labour
Court, accordingly, vide its award dated September 16, 2005
declared that the appellant was entitled to reinstatement with
continuity of service and full back wages from the date of
demand notice, i.e., January 27, 1997.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.