GOPIKA CHANDRABHUSHAN SARAN Vs. XLO INDIA LTD
LAWS(SC)-2009-2-58
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on February 13,2009

GOPIKA CHANDRABHUSHAN SARAN Appellant
VERSUS
XLO INDIA LTD. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Leave Granted.
(2.) The issue that arises for our consideration in the present appeal is with regard to the scope of and ambit of the provisions of Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), more specifically, as to whether the proceedings under the said provision would cover within its purview only the employee of the company or also the persons claiming a right through him or under him.
(3.) In order to answer the aforesaid issue it would be necessary to set out the facts leading to filing of the case in which the aforesaid issue was raised and came to be considered: Mr. Chandra Bhushan Saran (since deceased) father of appellant No. 1 and maternal grandfather of appellant No. 2 was allotted third floor residential premises of the building "Devenshire House", Westfield Estate, at Bhulabhia Desai Road, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as "suit premises") since he was appointed as a Director and Technical Advisor of one M/s Automobile Products of India Ltd. (for short "API Ltd."). Subsequently he was appointed as Managing Director of the said company. The suit premises was owned by Her Highness Vijaya Raje Scindia Maharani of Gwalior and was taken on lease by the API Ltd. for the residential needs of its employee. However, Mr. C. B. Saran resigned as Managing Director and later on also as its Director. Subsequent to his resignation as Managing Director, he was appointed as the Managing Director of Ex-Cello Ltd., respondent No. 1 herein. Mr. C. B. Saran made a representation to the then Chairman of the API Ltd., that as a Managing Director of the respondent No. 1 company he was entitled to rent free accommodation and for the sake of convenience the API Ltd. may execute a licence agreement in respect of the suit premises in favour of respondent No. 1, who in turn may permit him to occupy the suit premises. The request of Mr. C.B. Saran was considered favourably in the Board Meeting dated 12.06.1968 in which Mr. Saran was also present as a Director. Accordingly, Mr. C. B. Saran along with his family, which consisted of his wife, son and daughter, continued to occupy the said premises. Mr. C. B. Saran expired in Germany on 16.07.1980 and on his demise his son Mr. Sanjay Saran, who was Joint Managing Director became the Managing Director of the respondent No. 1 company. By virtue of his employment with respondent No. 1 the suit premises was allotted in his favour and the appellant No. 1 being sister of Mr. Sanjay Saran and appellant No. 2 being his nephew continued to stay in the suit premises.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.