UNION OF INDIA Vs. SAALIM
LAWS(SC)-2009-5-254
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on May 21,2009

UNION OF INDIA Appellant
VERSUS
Saalim Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) THIS appeal has been filed by the Union of India being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dtd. 30/7/2002 passed by the Allahabad High Court, whereby the High Court has held that the respondent herein was below 18 years of age on the date of the alleged commission of the offence in question. In that view of the matter, a direction was issued by the High Court that the case of the respondent herein would be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.
(2.) THE aforesaid order of the High Court and the directions issued therein are under challenge in this appeal on which we have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant as also the learned counsel for the respondent. The respondent was arrested for alleged commission of an offence under Ss. 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Before the Special Judge, a contention was raised on behalf of the respondent that he was a juvenile within the meaning of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. The aforesaid claim of the respondent was supported by a certificate issued by the school on the basis of the school leaving register. If the age of the respondent is computed on the basis of the said certificate issued by the school on the basis of the school leaving register and he is found to be a juvenile on the date of the alleged commission of offence, he was entitled to the benefits as provided under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000.
(3.) THE trial court, however, ignored the entries made in the school leaving register and relying on the entries made in the Pariwar Register and the medical certificate, and on making its own assessment on the basis of the general appearance of the respondent, held that the respondent was not a juvenile on the date of commission of offence. The aforesaid findings of the trial court were held to be erroneous and illegal by the High Court for according to the High Court, emphasis should have been given and reliance should have been placed on the school leaving register which is one of the recognised and authentic documents for the purpose of determining the age of a person.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.