JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) These appeals relate to admission to the MBBS Course for the 1997-98 session in the various medical colleges in the State of Maharashtra. Admission to medical colleges in the said State is made on regional basis. The admission is governed by the rules issued by the State Government which provided for preparation of the merit list on the basis of the marks obtained in Physics, Chemistry and Biology in the Board examination. In the private medical colleges there were merit seats as well as payment seats. On the basis of their position in the merit list the appellants were offered merit seats in seven private medical colleges out of which five were recognised colleges and two were non-recognised colleges. The appellants did not choose to avail the said offer of merit seats. They opted for payment seats in Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Vidyasagar, respondent No. 2 herein. Subsequently, some vacancies occurred against merit seats in the said college and the appellants claimed that on the basis of their position in the merit list they should have been considered for admission against those merit seats. The grievance of the appellants is that without considering the claim of the appellants for admission to those merit seats which became available subequently admission has been given to respondent No. 4, Ms. Meenakshi Panth, against a merit seat in respondent No. 2 even though she is at a lower position than the appellants in the merit list. Feeling aggrieved by the said admission of respondent No. 4 and denial of admission to them against merit seats in respondent No. 2, the appellants filed separate writ petitions in the Bombay High Court which have been dismissed by the impugned judgments dated October 10, 1997.
(3.) Shri Uday Umesh Lalit, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, has placed reliance on Rules 9 and 10 of the Rules governing the selection process. The said Rules may be reproduced as follows:-
"Rule 9 Waiting Lists
At the time of selection, the applicant may opt to remain on waiting list, if not selected to the course of choice. In that case, the candidate's name will not be considered for selection to any other course. After the merit seats are exhausted, the applicant who does not desire to take payment seat, is allowed to remain on waiting-list for merit seat for the course of his choice. The applicants who are selected for admission to merit seats and payment seats of private colleges will be considered as wait listed candidates for filling up the seats falling vacant at Government Colleges. Similarly, the applicants who are selected for admission to payment seats of private colleges will also be considered as wait-listed candidates for filling of merit seats falling vacant in Private Colleges. Such waiting list will be maintained till the last date of enrolment by the University. As and when vacancies arise, the applicants in waiting list will be given admission as per their merit position on waiting list. Backward Class candidates will not be permitted to remain wait-listed in open merit category.
Rule 10. Selection Against Casual or Drop Out Seats
a. Only the wait-listed applicant will be eligible for selection against the casual or drop out seats. The waiting list will be prepared regionwise including the reserved category.
b. The Competent Authority will publish the vacancy position of casual/drop out seats for respective region and the programme of filling up the vacancies after regular selection process is completed. The casual or drop out seats will be filled up on descending order of merit and for each applicant as per the order of choice given by applicant.
c. A wait-listed applicant must remain present in person or through an authorised proxy to claim a casual or drop out seat along with his original candidate (sic) for verification." ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.