ROYAL TALKIES HYDERABAD Vs. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
LAWS(SC)-1978-8-15
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on August 09,1978

ROYAL TALKIES,HYDERABAD Appellant
VERSUS
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Law is essentially the formal expression of the regulation of economic relations in society. That is the key note thought in this case, where the core question is: who is an employee Secondly, to decide the meaning of a welfare measure a feeling for the soul of the measure is a surer guide than meticulous dissection with lexical tools alone.
(2.) The definitional amplitude of 'employee' in section 2 (9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is the sole contentious issue canvassed by counsel at the bar. We have heard Shri Chitale for the appellant and the learned Attorney General for the respondent-Corporation at some length, because a decision by this court as to the width of the definition and consequential fallout of statutory obligations may cover a considerable number of establishments. We have granted leave to appeal on that basis and now proceed to study the anatomy of 'employee' as defined in section 2(9) of the Act.
(3.) A brief factual narration may help get a hang of the case. The High Court, before which the present appellants had filed these appeals, has summarised the facts succinctly thus: "The appellants are owners of theatres in the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad, where films are exhibited. Within the same premises as the theatre, in every case, there is a canteen and a cycle stand. The canteen and the cycle stand are leased out to contractors under instruments of lease. The contractors employ their own servants to run the canteen and the cycle stand. In regard to persons so employed by the contractors, the owners of the theatres were treated as 'Principal Employers' and notices of demand were issued to them calling upon them to pay contribution under the Employees' State Insurance Act. Thereupon the owners of theatres filed application under S. 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act before the Employees' Insurance Court for a declaration that the provisions of the Act were not applicable to their theatres and that they were not liable to any contribution in respect of the persons employed in the canteens and cycle-stands attached to the theatres.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.