CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER PUNJAB CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER PUNJAB UNION OF INDIA Vs. OM PARKASH:AJIT SINGH KALHA:PARTAP SINGH
LAWS(SC)-1968-4-40
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on April 05,1968

UNION OF INDIA,CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER,PUNJAB Appellant
VERSUS
PARTAP SINGH,OM PARKASH,AJIT SINGH KALHA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This appeal is brought, by certificate, from the judgment of the Punjab High Court dated September 18, 1968 in Civil Writ No. 841 of 1962.
(2.) Nanak Chand owned agricultural lands in Bahawalpur State now forming part of West Pakistan. He also owned some property at Kot Kapura, Tehsil Faridkot, District Bhatinda now located in India. Nanak Chand had in normal course of business come to Bhatinda where he died in June, 1947 leaving behind three sons, Om Parkash, Sat Narain and Ram Parshotam who are the respondents in this appeal. As a result of the partition of India the land originally owned by Nanak Chand and after his death by his sons in Bahawalipur State had to be abandoned. After the partition of India the three respondents migrated to India and filed separate claims in accordance with law and obtained allotment of certain area in village Kot Kapura, District Bhatinda in lieu of the land abandoned by them in Pakistan. The Revenue Authorities allotted an area measuring 206.8 1/2 standard acres in village Kot Kapura, District Bhatinda. After the allotment was made one Rur Singh filed a complaint before the Managing Officer that these respondents had received double allotments in village Kot Kapura. The complaint was examined by Shri Shankar Das Katyal, Managing Officer who held that Shri Rur Sing failed to substantiate the allegation of double allotment. But the Managing Officer came to the conclusion that Nanak Chand although he had died long before the partition of the country must be treated as a displaced land holder for the purpose of allotment of land. The reason given was that his name continued to be shown in the Jamabandi as the owner of the abandoned land in Pakistan. In consequence of this finding a large portion of the land allotted to the three respondents was cancelled by the Managing Officer by his order dated September 18, 1961. The three respondents preferred an appeal before the Assistant Settlement Commissioner and a revision petition before the Chief Settlement Commissioner, Punjab but the appeal and revision petition were both dismissed. In dismissing the revision petition the Chief Settlement Commissioner, relied upon paragraph 17 of Tarlok Singh's Land Resettlement Manual, 1952 Edition page 180 which was to the following effect: "Even where a displaced land holder in whose name the land stands in the records received from West Punjab has died, the allotment is made in the name of the deceased. In the fard taqsim, therefore, the entry will be in the name of the deceased land holder, Possession is ordinarily given to the heirs but there must be regular mutation proceedings before the entry in column 3 of the fard taqsim is altered in favour of the heirs." It was held by the Chief Settlement Commissioner that this paragraph related to all persons who continue to be shown as owners in the revenue records irrespective of the fact whether they had died before or after migration. In other words, the Chief Settlement Commissioner took the view that the land could only be allotted in the name of Nanak Chand even assuming that he had died in June 1947. Against the order of the Chief Settlement Commissioner the respondents filed a Writ Petition (Civil Writ No. 841 of 1961) before the Punjab High Court. The Writ Petition was allowed by the High Court by its order dated September 13, 1963 and the orders of the Chief Settlement Commissioner dated June 8, 1962, of the Assistant Settlement Commissioner dated December 26, 1961 and of the Managing Officer dated September 18, 1961 were all quashed by the grant of a writ in the nature of certiorari.
(3.) It is necessary at this stage to set out the provisions of the relevant statutes. Section 2 (b) of the East Punjab Evacuees' (Administration of Property) Act, 1947 (East Punjab Act No. XIV of 1947) defines an "evacuee" as meaning "a person ordinarily resident in or owning property or carrying on business within the territories comprised in the Province of East Punjab, who on account of civil disturbances, or the fear of such disturbances, or the partition of the country: (i) leaves, or has since the first day of March, 1947, left the said territories for a place outside India, or (ii) cannot personally occupy or supervise his property or business." Section 4 of that Act provided that "All evacuee property situated within the Province shall vest in the Custodian for the purposes of this Act and shall continue to be so vested until the Provincial Government by notification otherwise directs." In pursuance of the powers conferred by the rules made by the State Government under Clauses (f) and (ff) of S. 22 (2) of the East Punjab Evacuees' (Administration of Property) Act, 1947, the Custodian issued a notification No. 4892/S on July 8, 1949 regarding the conditions on which he was prepared to grant allotment of land vested in him under the provisions of the said Act to displaced persons. Para 2 (e) of this notification states: " 'Displaced person' means a land holder in the territories now comprised in the province of West Punjab or a person of Punjabi extraction who holds land in the Provinces of North-Western Frontier Province, Sind or Baluchistan or any state adjacent to any of the aforesaid Provinces and acceding to the Dominion of Pakistan and who has since the 1st day of March, 1947, abandoned or been made to abandon his land in the said territories on account of civil disturbances, or the fear of such disturbances, or the partition of the country. section 2 (d) of the East Punjab Refugees (Registration of Land Claims) Act, 1948 (East Punjab Act No. XII of 1948) states; "2. Interpretation.-In this Act unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,- .................., (d) 'refugee' means a landholder in the territories now comprised in the Province of West Punjab, or who or whose ancestor migrated as a colonist from the Punjab since 1901 to the Provinces of North-West Frontier Province, Sind or Baluchistan or to any State adjacent to any of the aforesaid Provinces and acceding to the Dominion of Pakistan and who has since the 1st day of March, 1947, abandoned or been made to abandon his land in the said territories on account of civil disturbances, or the fear of such disturbances, or the partition of the country;" Section 2 (c) defines a "landholder" to mean "an owner of land or a tenant having a right of occupancy under the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 (XVI of 1887) or a tenant as defined in Section 8 of the Colonization of Government Lands Act, 1912 (Punjab Act V of 1912) and such other holder or grantee of land as may he specified by the Provincial Government;". Section 2 (c) of the East Punjab Displaced Persons (Land Resettlement) Act, 1949 (East Punjab Act No. XXXVI of 1949) defines a "displaced person" as follows: " 'displaced person' means a landholder in the territories now comprised in the Province of West Punjab or a person of Punjabi extraction who holds land in the Provinces of North-West Frontier Province, Sind or Baluchistan or any State adjacent to any of the aforesaid Provinces and acceding to the Dominion of Pakistan and who has since the 1st day of March, 1947, abandoned or been made to abandon his land in the said territories on account of Civil disturbances, or the fear of such disturbances, or the partition of the country". Section 2 (b) of this Act defines an "allottee" as follows: "'allottee' means a displaced person to whom land is allotted by the Custodian under the conditions published with East Punjab Government notification No. 4892/S, dated the 8th July, 1949, and includes his heirs, legal representatives and sub-lessees".;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.