STATE OF BIHAR Vs. MAHARAJA PRATAP SINGH BABADUR
LAWS(SC)-1968-4-35
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PATNA)
Decided on April 11,1968

STATE OF BIHAR Appellant
VERSUS
MAHARAJA PRATAP SINGH BABADUR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Bachawat, J. - (1.) This appeal is directed against an order allowing a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution. Maharaja Pratap Singh Bahadur was the proprietor of the estates collectively known as the Gidhaur estate, in Monghyr district. On the publication of a notification under S. 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act XXX of 1950) on July 24, 1953 the Gidhaur estate and the interests of the Maharaja therein vested in the State of Bihar. The Maharaja was receiving a permanent malikana allowance of Rs. 5743/14/6 annually in two equal six monthly instalments as shown in annexure ''A" to the writ application. The registers and rolls of the recipients of the malikana maintained by the Collector of the district since a long time past show that the successive proprietors of the Gidhaur estate were receiving the malikana for a long time past. The State of Bihar stopped payment of the malikana allowance from April 1, 1958 on the ground that the proprietary interests of the Maharaja in the Gidhaur estate vested in the State and consequently his right to the malikana was extinguished.
(2.) The Maharaja alleged in the writ petition that the permanent malikana was payable irrespective of his proprietary rights in his estates notified under Section 3 and was not income or rent from those estates nor a charge or incumbrance on them. He alleged that the stoppage of the payment of the malikana was illegal and asked for a writ directing the State to make payment of the malikana. The State did not file any return to the petition. The High Court held that the Maharaja's right to the malikana was not an intermediary interest in the Gidhaur estate and did not cease with the extinction of his proprietary right in the estate. Accordingly, the High Court issued a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the State of Bihar to pay the malikana due to the Maharaja from April 1, 1958. The State of Bihar has filed this appeal on a certificate granted by the High Court.
(3.) Section 2 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act is the definition section. Section 2 (i) defines an estate to mean any land included under one entry in any of the general registers of revenue paying an revenue free lands and includes a share of or in any estate. Section 2(jj) defines an "intermediary" in relation to any estate or tenure to mean a proprietor, tenure-holder, under tenure-holder and trustee. Section 2 (jjj) defines an "intermediary interest" as meaning the interest of an intermediary in an estate or tenure. Section 2 (o) defines "proprietor" to mean a person holding in trust or owning for his own benefit an estate or part of an estate. Section 2 (r) defines a "tenure-holder" to mean a person who has acquired from a proprietor or another tenure-holder the right to hold land for the purpose of collecting rent or bringing it under cultivation by establishing tenants on it and includes inter alia the holder of a tenure created for maintenance of any person. Section 2 (q) defines tenure to mean the interest of a tenureholder or under tenure-holder. Under Section 2-A the expressions "proprietor or tenure-holder and "estate or tenure" mean and include "intermediary" and the "intermediary interest" respectively. Section 3 (1) states that the State Government may, from time to time, by notification declare that the estates or tenures of a proprietor or tenure-holder, specified in the notification, have passed to and become vested in the State. Sections 4 (a) and 24-A (1) are as follows: "4. Consequences of the vesting of an estate or tenure in the State. -Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law or the time being in force or in any contract on the publication of the notification under sub-section (1) of Section 3, or sub-section (1) or (2) of Section 3-A the following consequences shall ensue, namely:- (a) Such estate or tenure including the interests of the proprietor or tenureholder in any building or part of a building comprised in such estate or tenure and use primarily as office or cutchery for the collection of rent of such estate or tenure, and his interests in trees, forests, fisheries, Jalkars, hats, bazars, mela and ferries and all other sairati interests as also his interest in all subsoil including any rights in mines and minerals whether discovered or undiscovered, or whether being worked or not, inclusive of such rights of a lessee of mines and minerals, comprised in such estate or tenure (other than the interests of raiyats or under-raiyats) shall with effect from the date of vesting, vest absolutely in the State free from all incumbrances and such proprietor or tenureholder shall cease to have any interests in such estate or tenure other than the interests expressly saved by or under the provisions of this Act." "Section 24-A (1). Determination of compensation of any intermediary of temporarily settled estate -In the case of such intermediary of a temporarily settled estate, the Compensation Officer shall determine the compensation payable in respect of the transference to the State of the interest of the intermediary in such temporarily settled estate, whether let in farm or held in khas, at a sum equal to twenty times of the malikana payable to him during the previous agricultural year and, where the intermediary has taken out the engagement of the lands comprised in such estate for a fixed period on the payment of a fixed jama, also a sum equal to the pro rata refund of the fixed jama paid by him for the unexpired period of the engagement." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.