DR. BABLOO SINGH AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
LAWS(SC)-2018-11-62
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on November 27,2018

Dr. Babloo Singh And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
State of U.P. and Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

UDAY UMESH LALIT,J. - (1.) Permission to file special leave petition granted in all matters. Heard Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Mr. Salman Khurshid and Mr. S.G. Hasnain, learned Senior Advocates in support of the petitions.
(2.) These petitions are directed against the order dated 10.10.2018 passed by a bench of five learned Judges of the High Court of Allahabad in Writ Petition No.51212 of 2010 and other connected matters turning down the reference made to a larger bench and directing that the concerned matters be placed before an appropriate court for disposal of writ petitions and other connected matters.
(3.) Two learned Judges of the High Court, finding themselves unable to agree with the view taken by another bench of two learned Judges in Dr. Vishwajeet Singh and others. v. State of U.P. and others.; 2009 (4) ADJ 373 as well as the view expressed by a Full Bench of the High Court in Heera Lal v. State of U.P .; 2010 (6) ADJ 1 (FB) formulated following questions to be considered and decided by a bench of more than three Judges. "1. Whether the rules of reservations under the U.P. Act No.4 of 1994 are applicable to appointment on the post of lecturers, by direct recruitment, in the aided postgraduate and undergraduate colleges in the State of UP, affiliated to the State Universities by clubbing all the vacancies as provided under Section 12(3) of the UP Higher Education Service Commission Act, 1980 subject-wise; or the vacancies have to be worked out for applicability of rules of reservation college-wise and subject-wise? 2. Whether there has to be plurality posts in the cadre, for applying the rules of reservation, which means more than one; or there has to be at least five posts in the cadre for applying the rules of reservations? 3. Whether the vacancies arising in any recruitment year under Rule 3(2) of UP Act No.4 of 1994 can be filled up separately even if they have not been advertised earlier, in that recruitment year or in the subsequent recruitment year, or such reserved vacancies have to be advertised at least once to be carried over for the recruitment in the same year or in the subsequent year? 4. What is the meaning of the words 'unfilled vacancies' in Section 3(2) of UP Act No.4 of 1994? 5. Whether Dr. Vishwajeet Singh's case (supra) and the Full Bench decision in Heera Lal's case (supra) have been correctly decided?";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.