JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) The High Court has kept the matter pending before it, directed interim inspection to be made and to submit a
report within seven days. It was also submitted before the
High Court that the Medical Council of India (MCI) would
inspect as per interim order. However, learned senior
counsel appearing for the petitioner-MCI has stated that
they have issued a show cause to the counsel for making
such a statement before the Court. Be that as it may.
(3.) After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the High Court should have taken a call
on a question whether further inspection was required or
not, only after hearing the matter at the time of deciding
the case finally and not before that. It was not
appropriate to direct interim inspection and to submit the
report to the High Court after inspection, as the report
has to be considered by the concerned authority. If the
High Court is of the opinion that there has to be a fresh
inspection, it may order but not before final decision.
We leave the question open to be agitated and decided at
the time of final hearing. We have not commented on the
merits of the case. The impugned order is not to be given
effect. Let the matter be heard and decided finally as
expeditiously as possible.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.