JUDGEMENT
N. V. RAMANA, J. -
(1.) These appeals arise out of common judgment and order dated 21st January, 2011 passed by the High Court of
Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal Nos. 775
SB of 1997 and 101SB of 1998, whereby the High Court set
aside the judgment passed by the trial Court and altered the
conviction and sentence against the appellant accused from an
offence under Section 304 Part II, IPC to that of under Section
302 , IPC .
(2.) The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 21 st July, 1995 at about 9 p.m. when the complainant Darshan Lal (PW 5) and his mother were sitting in the compound of their house, his
brother Som Raj (deceased) went upstairs. Soon thereafter, their
neighboring residents Sukhdev Singh (A1), Sandeep Singh (A2),
Ramesh Singh (A3) and Lali @ Tarlok Singh (A4) armed with
deadly weapons came from the upstairs dragging Som Raj and
beating him with the weapons alleging that he had thrown stones
into their house. The complainant and his mother though
requested the accused not to beat the deceased, the accused did
not pay any heed to their request and took away Som Raj to the
flour mill of one Tara Singh and tore off his clothes. In the
commotion, Som Raj managed to escape from their clutches and
ran into the house of Bansi Lal in nude form itself and bolted
from inside. The accused again caught hold of Som Raj and given
severe beatings to him and brought him near the bus stop of the
village. At that point of time, the appellant herein Ramji (A5), who
appeared there in his SPO uniform repeatedly gave kick blows to
Som Raj on his head, chest and neck. By applying full force,
Ramji (A5) pressed the neck of Som Raj till he became
unconscious. Thereafter, all the accused lifted Som Raj and
thrown him in front of his house and fled away. The complainant
took him to Civil Hospital, Mukerian where he succumbed to the
injuries at about 12.30 a.m. on 22.7.1995.
(3.) Upon informing by the hospital authorities, Inspector Ram Prakash (PW 9) went to the hospital and recorded the
statement of complainant and registered FIR against the accused.
After preparing inquest report and recording statements of
witnesses, the I.O. visited the spot, prepared site plan. It was
followed by the arrest of the accused and recovery of weapons
used in the offence. All the accused were challanned for the
offence under Section 302/34, IPC . The case was then committed
to the Court of learned Sessions Judge for trial.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.