JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties at great length.
(2.) This court has passed an order on 9.5.2018 inviting further fresh bids. Pursuant thereto, advertisement was published in the newspapers namely the 'Indian Express', 'Hindustan Times' and 'Dainik Jagran'. Properties available for Sale - has been specified in Part-A; in Part -B 'Properties/lands under litigation before Court/Committee' has been detailed, in Part-C 'Surplus Land declared by the State of Punjab and Uttrakhand' was mentioned and in Part-D - Properties/Lands yet to be identified (as per Dr. Nanavati's Report) was mentioned. All the properties were for sale.
(3.) It was submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the investors and the learned counsel appearing for the Committee appointed by this Court and others that valuation of the properties mentioned in the auction notice has not been done. It was pointed out that some valuation was carried out in the year 1998 by one of the Chartered Accountants. The valuation made in the year 1998 or by Hawk Group cannot be relied upon for making auction of the property as the value of the property has gone very high since then.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.