JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Civil Appeal No.6447 of 2001 has been
taken up for hearing along with five other
matters, namely, Special Leave Petition (C)
No.15469 of 2005, Special Leave Petition (C)
No.16573 of 2006, Special Leave Petition (C)
No. 20260 of 2004, Special Leave Petition (C)
No.8661 of 2004 and Civil Appeal No.2629 of
2006. All the said matters are directed
against orders passed by the National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission on Revision
Petitions filed from orders passed by the State
Commission, Kerala, in appeal from orders
passed by the District Forum. All of them
involve a common question of law and fact and
have thus been taken up together for hearing
and final disposal.
(2.) Of the five matters, Special Leave
Petition (C) Nos. 20260 of 2004 and Special
Leave Petition (C) No. 8661 of 2004 have
been filed against order dated 30.7.2002 passed
by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the
National Commission') dismissing the Revision
Petitions filed by the Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner for condonation of delay in filing
the Review Petition. Both the Revision
Petitions were dismissed on the ground that the
delay had not been sufficiently explained.
Though in these two Special Leave Petitions it
is the order rejecting the Revision Petitions
on ground of delay that is involved,
ultimately, it is the order of the State
Commission allowing the claim of the
respondents concerned which is the subject
matter of all these five matters. Furthermore,
the effect of the orders passed by the National
Commission in all these five matters is the
same in respect of the different petitioners
before the District Forum and it is their claim
which has been upheld right through up to the
National Commission.
(3.) Leave is accordingly granted in the
Special Leave Petitions and all the appeals are
taken up for hearing together.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.