JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present appeal is preferred by the
appellant against some of the directions issued
in the judgment delivered by the High Court of
Judicature at Madras on December 23, 1999 in
Civil Writ Petition No. 19842 of 1999. By the
said judgment, the High Court held that though
the appellant herein-writ petitioner in the
High Court-had not violated the terms and
conditions of the permission granted to him to
shoot a film and had not caused damage to the
grassland or adversely affected environment, he
would deposit Rs. fifty lakhs which will be
utilized for protection and improvement of
environment and the forest in and around
Udhagamandalam.
(2.) To appreciate the grievance raised by
the appellant in the present appeal, few
relevant facts may be noted.
(3.) The appellant is the sole proprietor
of M/s Devgan Films which inter alia is engaged
in the production and direction of films since
1996. The appellant conceived an idea of
producing a musical film for children titled
"Raju Chacha". The appellant initially started
shooting of the said film in the Gulmarg area
in Kashmir but due to Kargil war, the shooting
was postponed. Then, a decision was taken to
change the venue to Schoolmund (Wenlock Downs
Reserve Forest), Ooty in the State of Tamil
Nadu. For the said purpose, the appellant made
an application to the Principal Chief
Conservator of Forests of the State of Tamil
Nadu on August 31, 1999 for issuance of 'no
objection certificate' to shoot a part of the
film in the Nilgiri South and North Division.
On the same day, the Principal Chief
Conservator of Forests granted such permission
for a period of 120 days from October 01, 1999
to March 30, 2000. The appellant deposited an
amount of Rs. 60,000/- @ Rs. 500/- per day for
120 days with the Information and Tourism
Department towards fee for using the area in
question. He also deposited an amount of
Rs.5,000/- under the head "Miscellaneous and
Photograph expenses". On September 06, 1999,
the Director of Information and Public
Relations granted necessary permission for
shooting in Nilgiri District, Ooty. On October
5, 1999, the appellant furnished a refundable
security deposit of Rs. two lakhs in savings
account towards permission for shooting the
film and erection of pre-fabricated sets in the
designated area. Immediately thereafter on
October 07, 1999, the permission sought by the
appellant was granted to erect sets of a
particular size. The appellant stated that
similar permissions had been granted for more
than 100 films during previous years for
shooting in the Nilgiri under the Tamil Nadu
Forests Department Code, 1984. A formal
agreement was executed between the sole
proprietor of M/s Devgan Films on the one hand
and the District Forest Officer ('DFO' for
short), Nilgiri South Division-respondent
No.2, on the other hand, whereby permission was
granted for shooting the film and erection of
temporary sets of the size of 60mm x 60mm
subject to the conditions specified therein.
The appellant was directed to deposit an amount
of Rs.10,800/- as ground rent for erection of
temporary sets. A copy of the said agreement
has been produced by the appellant in the
present proceedings.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.