CHANDRABHAI K BHOIR Vs. KRISHNA ARJUN BHOIR
LAWS(SC)-2008-11-93
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on November 07,2008

Chandrabhai K. Bhoir And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
Krihsna Arjun Bhoir And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Application of Section 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short "the Act") is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 5.02.2007 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No. 889 of 2006.
(3.) The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. One Kanha Barik Mhatre executed a Will on or about 8.09.1963; the legatees whereunder are the respondents herein. He expired on 6.08.1974. An application for grant of probate in respect of the said Will was filed by the respondents. Appellants filed a caveat thereto, pursuant whereto a suit was directed to be registered. In the said suit, a compromise was entered into by and between the parties; the terms whereof inter alia are: "1. The parties have settled their disputes as per agreement executed today... 2. The parties agree that even though the Probate will be granted to the Petitioner unconditionally the terms of the Will stand changed and/ or altered on terms of agreement Annexure 'A' hereto. 3. The parties agree that they have no objection if the probate is granted unmodified by the terms of the agreement Ex. 'A'. However, the parties agree and undertake to this Hon'ble Court that their rights and obligations would be regulated by the terms of Agreement Ex. 'A' hereto and that an order should be sought on the said terms. 4. In view of the above agreements and terms the Caveators/ Caveatorics withdraw their caveat." However, an agreement by way of family arrangement was also entered into by and between the parties on or about 2.12.1992; Clauses 2, 3 and 5 whereof are relevant for our purpose, which read as under: "2. The parties of the First Part has agreed to allow the party of the second part to develop the entire property including the share of the party of the First Part and also further agree to sell their share to the party of the second part for Rs. 19,00,000/-. 3. The said amount is to be paid in the manner stated hereinafter: (a) Rs. 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) shall be paid by the Developer on the execution of these presents. (b) Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only) within a period of six months from the date of the execution of these presents. (c) Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only) within a period of 12 months from the date of the execution of these presents. (d) Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only) within a period of 18 months from the date of the execution of these presents. (e) Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rupees four lakh only) within a period of 24 months from the date of the execution of these presents." 5. The party of the other part hereby agrees to pay the said amount as stated above to the party of the first part and further agrees to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum on such amount which not paid on due date from the due date till payment thereof and till that date the said unpaid amount along with accrued interest shall constitute a charge over the property mentioned herein." Clause 6 contained in the recital part of the said agreement reads as under: "6. The party of the second part agrees to accept the share of the parties of the 1st part in the property at Dahisar more particularly described in the schedule hereto and further agree that aggregate share of all the parties of the first part is by consent valued at Rs. 19,00,000/- and the parties of the first part have agreed to allow party of the second part to develop the entire land including the share of the parties of the first part which they have agreed to sell to the party of the second part or his nominees at the agreed price of Rs. 19,00,000/-.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.