JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Respondent - Larsen & Tourbo Ltd. (L&T) is engaged in
executing civil, mechanical and other building works
throughout India including Andhra Pradesh. During the
relevant period it entered into contracts with its clients
(contractees) whose names are given in the annexure to the
original writ petition filed in the High Court of Andhra
Pradesh. Under the Contract, L&T, with the consent of the
contractee, was permitted to assign parts of construction work
to the sub-contractors whose names are also given in the list
annexed to the original writ petition filed in the High Court.
Accordingly, L&T placed orders on such sub-contractors for
agreed price, inclusive of applicable taxes. The overall work
was done under the supervision of the consultants nominated
by the contractee. The sub-contractors were registered
dealers. The sub-contractors purchased goods and chattel
like bricks, cement and steel and, where necessary, supply
and erect equipments such as lifts, hoist, etc. The materials
were brought to site. They remained the property of the sub-
contractors. The site was occupied by sub-contractors. The
materials were erected by the sub-contractors.
(3.) L&T was served with a notice dated 10.3.06 in which it
was alleged that the Company had failed to disclose the sub-
contractors' turnover of Rs.111,53,05,835/- in the returns
filed upto 31.1.06 for the period 1.4.05 to 31.1.06. In reply,
L&T submitted that under Section 4(7)(a) of the Andhra
Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 ("2005 Act", for short)
there was no provision for inclusion of sub-contractors'
turnover in the turnover filed by the Company; that, the
scheme of the said Act at the relevant time did not
contemplate for the declaration of sub-contractors' turnover
and, that, under the scheme of the said 2005 Act the sub-
contractor was a "dealer".;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.