JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a
Division Bench of the Patna High Court dismissing the writ
petition filed by the appellants. The writ petition was filed
challenging vires of certain provisions of Bihar Land Reforms
(Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act,
1961 (in short 'the Act'). The writ petition filed by the
appellants was dismissed on the ground that no return was
filed, and after preparation of draft statements they could have
got opportunity to file objection. It was held that the writ
petition was filed challenging vires of an enactment which was
included in 9th Schedule of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in
short the 'Constitution').
(2.) In support of the appeal learned counsel for the
appellants submitted that since the vires of certain provision
were being challenged and the amendment to Section 29 of the
Act was under challenge, the question of filing return did not
arise. Further it was submitted that the amendment was not
included in the 9th Schedule as was observed by the High
Court. Earlier, all the writ petitioners were granted exemption
under Section 29(2) (a)(ii) of the Act to hold an extra unit
required for the purpose of performing religious rites and its
maintenance but by the amendment the same was taken
away.
(3.) Learned counsel for the respondent-State on the other
hand submitted that though the amendment was not part of
the 9th Schedule to the Constitution, yet the effect of the
amendment is that the power to exempt stood deleted with
retrospective effect.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.