JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition has been filed in the form of public interest
litigation by Common Cause (A Registered Society) through its
Director Shri H.D. Shourie r/o A-31, West End, New Delhi.
(2.) At the risk of Writ Petition, the petitioner sought for the
following reliefs:
(i) to issue a Writ, direction or order in the nature
of mandamus and/or any other writ, direction or
order directing the Respondent No.1, in
consultation with representatives of the Respondent
Nos.2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 and also representatives of other
States/UTs :-
(a) to set up fully satisfactory procedures of
licensing of vehicles and licensing of drivers,
for ensuring that the vehicles are fully
equipped with all the safety travel
requirements, and also ensure that drivers of
private vehicles as well as drivers of public
vehicles including buses and trucks, are fully
trained and are competent to drive the
respective types of vehicles, and to also
organize high-level training arrangements for
the drivers of respective types of vehicles;
appropriate procedures should also be ensured
for suspension/cancellation of driving licences
in the event of any default or for involvement
in any accident;
(b) to ensure provision of all infrastructural
requirements of roads, including signs,
signals, footpaths, repairs of roads, and all
such other requirements which will help to
minimise risks of accidents on the roads;
(c) to set up methodology and requirements
for undertaking scientific analysis of every
accident, for ensuring that similar causes do
not recur which can lead to accidents, thereby
minimizing the possibilities of accidents;
(d) to establish suitable organizations for
providing education to all types of users of
roads, through experts as well as use of
suitably devised visual and audio media;
(e) to ensure the availability of ambulances
for immediate removal of injured persons to
hospitals;
(f) to set up Committees of Experts in each
State/UT and in the bigger cities for dealing
with these various requirements for
minimization of accidents on the roads;
(ii) to direct Respondent No.1 to formulate a
suitable Road Traffic Safety Act to meet effectively
the various requirements for minimization of road
accidents; and
(iii) to pass such other and further orders as may
be deemed necessary to deal effectively with the
various matters relating to traffic Safety on the
roads and minimization of road accidents, on the
facts and in the circumstances of the case.
(3.) I had the privilege of going through the erudite judgment
prepared by my learned Brother Justice Katju and I
respectfully agree with the conclusion reached by my brother
Katju that the Writ Petition be dismissed. While coming to
this conclusion Brother Katju was of the opinion that the
Motor Vehicles Act is a comprehensive enactment on the
subject. He was further of the opinion that if there is lacuna
or defect in the Act it is for the legislature to correct it by a
suitable amendment and not by the Court. I am also of the
view that the relief sought for in this Writ Petition is
adequately taken care of by the Motor Vehicles Act itself and if
there is any lacuna or defect, it is the legislature to correct it
by amending the Act and not the Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.