JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The respondent Nos.2-15, who are members
of the respondent No.1 Union, and had
admittedly been employed under the
appellant as "seasonal workmen" as defined
in the Standing Orders governing the
conditions of employment of workmen in
vacuum pan sugar factories of the State,
raised a claim that although they had been
categorized as "seasonal workmen" they
had been employed by the appellant not
only during the crushing season but
throughout the year. It is their
grievance that although their services
were utilized as permanent workmen they
were paid the salary given to seasonal
workmen. They, therefore, made a
representation to the Conciliation Officer
which ultimately resulted in a Reference
made by the State of Uttar Pradesh to the
Labour Court on 3.11.1989. The terms of
Reference are as follows:
i) Whether 39 employees mentioned in
the Schedule 'Ka' can be declared
permanent by their employer. If
yes, from which date and with
other details ;
ii) Whether the 28 workmen mentioned
in the Schedule 'Kha' are to be
given salary/pay scales on the
posts mentioned against their
names by their employer. If yes,
from which date and with other
details -
(3.) At the very outset it may be recorded that
out of 39 employees, referred to in the
terms of reference, 8 have died or have
retired from service; 13 have been made
permanent; 4 workmen have not pressed
their claim before the Labour Court and
only 14 workmen, mentioned in Schedule
'Ka', had continued with their claim
before the Labour Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.