JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These appeals by special leave challenge the judgment dated
12.10.2001 of a Full Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court holding that
there can be no appointment on compassionate grounds in cases other than
death of a government servant in harness, and that any scheme for
compassionate appointment on medical invalidation of a government
servant, is unconstitutional, being violative of Article 16 of the Constitution
of India.
(2.) By GO dated 30.7.1980, the government of Andhra Pradesh
formulated a scheme for providing compassionate appointment to the
dependents (spouse/son/daughter) of Government servants who retired on
medical invalidation. By a further GO dated 4.7.1985, the benefit of the
scheme was restricted to cases where the Government servants retired on
medical invalidation, at least five years before attaining the age of
superannuation. To prevent misuse of the scheme, the State Government
issued GO dated 9.6.1998, prescribing suitable safeguards and procedures
by constituting Medical Boards, District/State Level Committees to examine
and recommend the applications for compassionate appointment on ground
of medical invalidation. It provided that as and when a government servant
sought retirement on medical grounds, the concerned appointing authority
should refer the case to the Medical Board; that on receiving the medical
opinion, he should refer the matter to the District Level Committee (or the
State Level Committee in respect of employees in the Secretariat); and that
the said Committee would scrutinize the proposals for compassionate
appointment in accordance with the guidelines and make its
recommendations to the State Government which would take the final
decision.
(3.) The following clarification was issued by Government Memo ('GM'
for short) dated 25.6.1999, as to the date with reference to which the five
year period prior to superannuation should be reckoned:
"It is hereby clarified that the benefit of compassionate appointment will
be applicable only to those government employees who retire on Medical
Invalidation Five (5) years before they attain the age of superannuation.
Therefore, the required period of five (5) years of left over service is to be
reckoned from the date of issue of orders of retirement on medical
invalidation. It is further clarified that in cases where the Government
employees do not have five (5) years of service before the employees
attain the age of superannuation at the time of considering such cases by
the State Level Committee or District Level Committees, the respective
Committees after scrutiny of Medical invalidation certificates in those
cases may recommend only for retirement of such government employees
on medical invalidation as per the certificate issued by the Medical
Board."
The said clarification led to considerable grievance. The government
servants felt that the clarification was not just. They contended that even
when a government servant made an application for medical invalidation
when the 'left over period' was more than five years, if there was delay on
the part of Medical Board and/or the District Level or State Level
Committee in processing and making the recommendations, the 'left over
period' may get reduced to less than five years thereby making his
dependant ineligible for the benefit of compassionate appointment. For
example, if an application for medical invalidation was made six years prior
to the due date of superannuation, but the process of verification by the
Medical Board, the process of recommendation by the District/State Level
Committee and the process of sanctioning of retirement, took more than one
year, and as a consequence the sanction for retirement is given on a date
when the 'left over period of service' is less than five years, for no fault of
the government servant, the benefit of compassionate appointment to his
dependant family member will be denied. Another example is where the
application is made five and half years prior to the due date of
superannuation, and the decision of the Medical Board and the
recommendations of the District/State Level Committee is given within
three months leaving a clear left over period of five years and three months,
but the state government takes four months and the actual sanction is given
on a date which falls within five years before the due date of
superannuation, the dependant of the government servant would be denied
the benefit of compassionate appointment for no fault of the government
servant or his dependant. They contended that when a government servant
gave the application when the 'left over period of service' was more than
five years, he should not be penalized by denial of compassionate
appointment to a family member, for reasons of delay on the part of the
Medical Board, or District/State Level Committee or the Government,
which are beyond his control. They therefore contended that the five year
period prior to superannuation should be calculated with reference to the
date of application for medical invalidation.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.