JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This order shall dispose of Civil Appeal Nos. 6469-
6470 of 2002, 7169 of 2004 and 1203 of 2008.
Civil Appeal Nos. 6469-6470 of 2002 & 1203 of 2008
(2.) The issue which arises for consideration in these
appeals is, whether the satilon brand cookware sold by the
appellants is an "aluminium household utensil made of
aluminum" and "aluminium alloys" classifiable under Entry 5
of the First Schedule under the Kerala General Sales Tax
Act, 1963 (for short "the Act") or whether the said product
would fall under Entry 104 which pertains to "pressure
cooker, cook and serve ware to keep food warm, casseroles,
water filters and similar home appliances not coming under
any other entry".
(3.) The authority in original i.e. Assistant Commissioner
(Assessment III), Ernakulam at the first instance accepted
the appellant's case and held that the Hawkins
Satilon Cookware manufactured by the appellant was
classifiable under Entry 5 of the First Schedule to the
Act. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in
exercise of his suo motu powers of revision, sought to
revise the assessment. A notice dated 10.9.1999 was issued
under Section 35 of the Act. Appellant replied to the said
notice. The Deputy Commissioner by an order dated
25.9.1999 set aside the earlier assessment and remanded the
matter for fresh disposal. The Deputy Commissioner held
that as the satilon coating made the goods non-stick, it
would make it different from the aluminium household
utensils made of aluminium, covered under Entry 5 of the
First Schedule. Aggrieved by the order passed by the
Deputy Commissioner, the appellant filed an appeal before
the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam (for short "the
Tribunal"). The Tribunal by its order dated 18.4.2001
upheld the order of Deputy Commissioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.