JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The present appeal is filed against
the judgment and order passed by the High
Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow
Bench) on February 24, 2006 in Writ Petition
No. 484 (S/B) of 2000.
(3.) Necessary facts giving rise to the
appeal are that the respondent herein was
serving with the appellant- U.P. State Sugar
Corporation Ltd. ("Corporation" for short) as
Resident Engineer at the Head Office of the
Corporation at Lucknow. On January 13, 2000,
a show cause notice was issued to him stating
therein that a work was allotted to M/s Gupta
& Co., Dehradoon for construction of
residential houses in Saharanpur. The
Contractor had given two Fixed Deposit
Receipts (FDRs) towards the security for the
work to be done. The details of FDRs were
given in the notice. It was alleged that the
Corporation suffered loss of Rupees one lakh
due to lack of precaution, irregularity, gross
negligence and carelessness by the respondent.
The respondent was, therefore, called upon to
submit explanation within three days why
disciplinary action should not be taken
against him. On January 15, 2000, the
respondent submitted his reply denying the
allegations and contending that he had not
committed any illegality and there was no
justification to ask for his explanation. The
Corporation was not satisfied with the reply
filed by the respondent and decided to hold
departmental inquiry against him. On January
31, 2000, therefore, show cause notice was
issued to the respondent for the losses caused
to the Corporation due to negligence and
carelessness on the part of the respondent.
It may be noted at this stage that the
respondent retired on attaining the age of
superannuation (60 years) on the same day,
i.e. January 31, 2000. According to the
respondent, since he retired from service on
January 31, 2000, no proceedings could have
been initiated against him and issuance of
show cause notice which was received by him
after office hours at 6.45 p.m. on January 31,
2000 was illegal as there was no relationship
of employer and employee between the
Corporation and him. He, therefore, filed a
writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad
at Lucknow Bench on April 11, 2000. In the
petition a prayer was made for quashing
charge-sheet and departmental proceedings.
During the pendency of the petition, however,
two orders came to be passed against the
respondent on March 24, 2001 and April 26,
2005. By the first order of March 24, 2001,
an amount of Rupees one lakh was ordered to be
recovered from the respondent as the
Corporation suffered loss of the said amount
which was ordered to be adjusted from the
gratuity of the respondent. By the second
order dated April 26, 2005, an amount of
Rs.73,235-50ps which was = portion of the
amount of Rs.1,46,471.00ps was directed to be
recovered as loss had been caused to the
Corporation due to negligence of the
respondent. The respondent sought amendment in
the petition and challenged the above two
orders as well.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.