JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of a
Division Bench of the Orissa High Court allowing the Writ
Petitions filed by Visa Industries Limited (in short the 'VISA')
and Another (Writ Petition (C) No. 5128 of 2004) and M/s.
Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.(in short the 'TISCO') (Writ Petition
(C) No. 6798 of 2004). By the impugned Judgment the High
Court held that the technical bids of VISA and TISCO could
not have been rejected at the threshold without proper
evaluation in terms of the eligibility condition as set out in the
concerned advertisement. It was also held that Jindal Strip
Limited (in short 'Jindal's') bids were never evaluated and
assessed in a dispassionate and impartial manner. There was
no attempt to find out as to which of the bids offered by the
three parties would give maximum advantage to the State in
terms of public interest and state exchequer. Certain other
observations were made questioning bonafides of the officials
of the State and Industrial Development Corporation of Orissa
Limited (in short the 'IDCOL'). It was held that power of
judicial review was to be exercised as the selection of Jindal as
a Joint Venture Partner for the project in question was not
properly done. Therefore the IDCOL's decision to select Jindal
cannot be maintained and was set aside.
(2.) It was noted that the matter could have been remitted to
IDCOL for fresh evaluation and formation of merits on the bids
of the respective parties, but it was not thought proper. It was
also noted that Jindal proposed to set up stainless Steel
Industry which could not have been considered as a relevant
factor while deciding the question of Joint Venture Partner.
However, IDCOL was given the opportunity to issue a fresh
advertisement for the purpose of setting out in clear terms
whether it wants stainless industries to be set up in the State
or other industry where chrome could be used as an
ingredient.
(3.) The technical bids offered by the various parties are on
record. By the last date for receipt of offers, four parties had
submitted their offers but later on Jindal Steel Power Ltd. did
not want to continue.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.