JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) S .B. Sinha, J
1. Leave granted.
(2.) WHETHER the period spent on pursuing a writ petition should be excluded for the purpose of computing the period of limitation in
filing a suit in terms of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is
the question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and
order dated 3 10.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in
First Appeal No. 388 of 1997.
The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. Appellant was a contractor of the State. It entered into a contract for
supply of black pipes to the Minor Irrigation Department of the State of
Bihar (for short "the Department") at the rate of Rs. 174.95 per
meter. The said agreement contained a clause for escalation of price.
On the premise that the price of steel had gone up from Rs. 10804 per MT
to Rs. 13031 per MT, appellant, by its letter dated 18.06.1992, stated
that as per the terms and conditions of the agreement supply would be
made only at the escalated rate for which the additional price was
calculated at Rs. 24.09 per meter.
(3.) ORDERS for seven lakh meters of supply of black pipes were placed on 16.07.1992. The State worked out the escalation and deter-mined the total increase at Rs. 24.09 per meter. On or about 4.11.1992, 'the Department',
however, fixed the escalated rate of price of steel at Rs. 190.48 instead
of Rs. 199.04.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.