UNION OF INDIA Vs. BRIJLAL THAKUR
LAWS(SC)-1997-3-66
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on March 17,1997

UNION OF INDIA Appellant
VERSUS
BRIJLAL THAKUR Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CHANDIGARH S S KALSI STATE OF PUNJAB UNION OF INDIA STATE OF PUNJAB STATE OF PUNJAB VS. FACULTY ASSOCIATION:M L SEHGAL:M L SEHGAL:K SIVAN:HARCHARAN SINGH:SHANGARA SINGH [LAWS(SC)-1998-4-1] [OVERRULED]
RAMAN LAL VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2000-4-82] [REFERRED TO]
POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CHANDIGARH VS. K L NARASIMHAN [LAWS(SC)-1997-5-33] [RELIED ON]
SMT. JAYASREE PAUL VS. THE STATE OF TRIPURA [LAWS(TRIP)-2016-9-6] [REFERRED]
ASHA CHAKRADHAR RAUT VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION SECONDARY [LAWS(BOM)-2003-7-113] [REFERRED TO]
R SHASHIDAR VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-1999-8-27] [REFERRED TO]
MEWA LAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2002-2-86] [REFERRED TO]
ONKAR DUTTA SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2001-4-94] [REFERRED TO]
VED PARKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2012-1-621] [REFERRED]
ARCHANA MISHRA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2010-12-1] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. BHARAT SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2011-3-44] [REFERRED TO]
DR. RAJENDRI KUMARI VS. KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY KURUKSHETRA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2006-10-563] [REFERRED]
K K RAJESH VS. STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(GAU)-2005-9-10] [REFERRED TO]
FADERI RAM VS. KALIKA SINGH [LAWS(CAL)-1998-6-6] [REFERRED TO]
NEW ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION NAGPUR VS. BALDEV FAKIRA ADE [LAWS(BOM)-2006-11-202] [REFERRED TO]
JAYASREE PAUL AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS. [LAWS(TRIP)-2015-7-60] [REFERRED TO]
R S GARG VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2000-5-28] [REFERRED TO]
PRADEEP SHRIVASTAVA VS. BARKATULLAH UNIVERSITY [LAWS(MPH)-2000-1-3] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. G S GILL [LAWS(SC)-1997-3-14] [REFERRED TO]
PRIYA AGRAWAL VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2022-2-29] [REFERRED TO]
D VASANTHA KAMALA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2006-11-34] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Delay condoned. Leave granted.
(2.)We have heard learned counsel on both sides.
(3.)This appeal by special leave arises from the order passed on March 31, 1995 by C.A.T., New Delhi in O. A. No. 1801/94.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.