MANAGING DIRECTOR HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER
LAWS(SC)-1997-7-160
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on July 07,1997

MANAGING DIRECTOR,HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Appellant
VERSUS
PRESIDING OFFICER Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Leave granted. These appeals by special leave arise from the orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, made on 23-8-1996 in CWP No. 12867/96 and 12866/96.
(2.) The admitted position is that the Haryana Seeds Development Corporation Ltd. has been carrying on the business of distribution of the certified varieties of the crop seeds to the farmers during Rabi and Kharif sowing seasons. As a consequence, a number of employees including the salesman like the respondents came to be appointed. It is also on record that due to heavy flood etc., a number of units including the seeds sales counter were closed. As a consequence, the services of the employees have been dispensed with. The respondent have sought a reference under Section 10(1)(e) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the "Act"). The Labour Court held that the dispensation of the services of the respondents amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Section 25-F of the Act. As a result without giving one month's notice or salary in lieu thereof, the retrenchment is bad in law. Accordingly, it passed the award which was affirmed by the High Court. Thus, these appeals by special leave.
(3.) Section 25-FFF of the Act regulates the closure of the industry which envisages as under : "25-FFF. Compensation to workman in case of closing down of undertaking- (1) where an undertaking is closed down for any reason whatsoever, every workman who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such closure shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of Section 25-F as if the workman had been retrenched : Provided that where the undertaking is closed down on account of unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the employer the compensation to be paid to the workman under Clause (b) of Section 25-F shall not exceed his average pay for three months.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.