JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This is an appeal by certificate against the judgment of a Full Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 20th November, 1970. The question involved in this appeal is ingenious but untenable. The question referred to the Full Bench reads as follows :
"Whether after the re-organisation of the State of Punjab the land owners owning land in both the States of Punjab and Haryana can claim to retain the permissible area in each State separately after 1st of November, 1960. If so, whether an order declaring the area to be surplus passed prior to the date above said, but which order has not been implemented and the surplus land so declared has not in fact been utilised would continue to have effect after said date -
Now the facts. Balwant Singh was a displaced person from West Pakistan. He owned in all 67 standard acres of land distributed in various villages. According to him he had sold some properties to strangers and the remaining in favour of his wife and minor son in 1957. On 8th November, 1960, when proceedings under the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1930 (1953) (for short the Act) were initiated, the Special Collector, Punjab, declared 29 standard acres belonging to him as surplus area. While doing so, the transfers made by him mentioned above were ignored. He had an option to choose the property which fell to his share. He opted for the entire land belonging to him and situated in village Samani as his permissible area and did not opt for any area in Mohamad Pera, District Ferozepore. The Special Collector reserved for him about 18 standard acres out of his holding in village Dhab Kharial in order to make up his permissible area of 50 standard acres. This part of the order of the Special Collector, though challenged in appeal, was confirmed by the Commissioner, Jullundar Division on 5th January, 1965, since the appeal before him was held to be barred by limitation. The appellant pursued the matter before the Financial Commissioner, Planning, Punjab, by filing a revision. This was dismissed on 19-2-1965.
(2.) On 1st November, 1966, the Punjab Re organisation Act, 1966, (for short, Re-organisation Act) came into force. The State of Punjab was distributed under the Act to the present State of Punjab, State of Haryana, Union Territory of Chandigarh and Union Territory of Himachal Pradesh. In December, 1966, Balwant Singh, his wife and his minor son filed a writ petition for the issuance of necessary directions to the States of Punjab and Haryana restraining them from utilising the surplus area declared by the Special Collector by his order dated 8-11-1960. It is relevant to note here that the original properties that belonged to him fell within the new State of Punjab and the new State of Haryana.
(3.) The matter came before a learned single Judge. The following questions were raised before him : (1) That after the States Reorganisation, persons owning lands both in the State of Punjab and Haryana could claim that they should be allowed permissible area in both the States separately, (2) that orders passed regarding surplus area prior to 1st November, 1986 (1966), and which area had not been utilised till then, should be deemed to have no effect and (3) that the proceedings declaring surplus land were bad for want of notice to the transferees. These contentions were repelled by the learned single Judge.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.