- (1.) Ahmedabad Jupiter Spinning Weaving and Manufacturing Company Limited was the owner of 5900 sq. yds. of land forming part of its mill premises at Lower Parel in Bombay which was sought to be acquired by the Maharashtra Government for a municipal school. Notifications under Ss. 4 and 6 were issued on June 19, 1961 and May 29, 1964 respectively. The company filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of the notifications on several grounds. A single Judge of the High Court having dismissed the writ petition on August 11, 1969 the company preferred a letters patent appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, the management of the company was taken over by the Central Government on October 8, 1972 under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act. 1951. On September 21, 1974 an Ordinance called the Sick Textile undertakings (Nationalisation) Ordinance, 1974 was promulgated by virtue of which the textile undertaking of the company the management of which had been taken over by the Central Government, vested absolutely in the Central Government with effect from the "appointed day", which was April 1, 1974, and immediately thereafter stood transferred and vested in the National Textile Corporation. The Ordinance was later replaced by the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act. 1974 (hereinafter referred to as Sick Textile Act). Ss. 3 and 4 of the Act are as follows: "3. Acquisition of rights of owners in respect of sick textile undertakings. (1) On the appointed day, every sick textile undertaking and the right, title and interest of the owner in relation to every such sick textile undertakings shall stand transferred to, and shall vest absolutely in, the Central government. (2) Every sick textile undertaking which stands vested in the Central Government by virtue of sub-s. (1) shall, immediately after it has so vested, stand transferred to, and vested in the National Textile Corporation. 4. General effect of vesting. (1) The sick textile undertaking referred to in S. 3 shall be deemed to include all assets, rights, leaseholds, powers, authorities and privileges and all property, movable and immovable, including lands, buildings, workshops, stores, instruments, machinery and equipment, cash balances, cash on hand, reserve funds, investments and book debts and all other rights and interests in, or arising out of, such property as were immediately before the appointed day in the ownership, possession, power or control of the owner of the sick textile undertaking, whether within or outside India, and all books of account, registers and all other documents of whatever nature relating thereto and shall also be deemed to include the liabilities and obligations specified in sub-s. (2) of S. 5. (2) All property as aforesaid which have vested in the Central Government under sub-s. (1) of S. 3 shall, by force of such vesting, be freed and discharged from any trust, obligation, mortgage, charge, lien and all other incumbrances affecting it, and any incumbrances affecting it, and any attachment, injunction or decree or order of any court restricting the use of such property in any manner shall be deemed to have been withdrawn." The other sub-sections of S. 4 are not relevant for the present purpose.
(2.) The National Textile Corporation applied to the High Court for being substituted in place of the original appellant in the letters patent appeal which was pending and the application was allowed. The main contention on behalf of the substituted appellant in the High Court was that the two notifications under Ss .4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act must be held to have become ineffective in view of S. 4 (2) of the Sick Textile Act which provides that all property which vests in the Central Government under S. 3 (1) does so free from all 'incumbrances affecting it." The High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the notifications under the Land Acquisition Act were not incumbrances within the meaning of S. 4 (2) of the Sick Textile Act. In the appeal before us filed with special leave obtained from this Court, the National Textile Corporation questions the correctness of the view taken by the High Court.
(3.) Thus the only question for determination in the appeal is whether the notifications issued under the Land Acquisition Act are incumbrances within the meaning of the word as used in S. 4 (2) of the Sick Textile Act. S. 3 and the first two sub-sections of S. 4 of the Sick Textile Act are the only provisions relevant in this context. S. 3. provides that on the appointed day every sick textile undertaking shall vest absolutely in the Central Government, and then in the National Textile Corporation. Sub-s. (1) of S. 4 states that the undertakings vesting in the Central Government under S. 3 shall be deemed to include all assets, rights and interests in the ownership, possession or control of the owners of such undertakings immediately before the appointed day. Sub-s. (2) of S. 4 provides that all property vesting in the Central Government under S. 3 shall. "by force of such vesting, be freed and discharged from any trust. obligation, mortgage, charge, lien and all other incumbrances affecting it, and any attachment, injunction or decree or order of any court restricting the use of such property in any manner shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.";