MEMBER FOR THE BOARD OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX ASSAM SMT SINDHURANI CHAUDHURANI JITENDRA NARAYAN DEB SOURINDRA NARAYAN CHOUDHURY BHAIRABENDRA NARAYAN BHUP BEDA BALA DEBI RANJIT NARAYAN CHAUDHURY KRITISH CHANDRA BARUA AND OTHEN Vs. SINDHURANI CHADHURANI:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASIAN:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM:STATE OF ASSAM
LAWS(SC)-1957-4-15
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on April 24,1957

MEMBER FOR THE BOARD OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX,ASSAM,SINDHURANI CHAUDHURANI,JITENDRA NARAYAN DEB,SOURINDRA NARAYAN CHOUDHURY,BHAIREBENDRA NARAYAN BHUP,BEDA BALA DEBI,RANJIT NARAYAN CHAUDHURY,KRITISH CHANDRA BARUA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM,SINDHURANI CHADHURANI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) In all these appeals the question for decision is the character and purport of the payment termed 'Salami' and whether it fails within the meaning of "agricultural income" as defined in the Assam Agricultural Income Tax Act (Act IX of 1939) hereinafter called the "Act".
(2.) C.A. No. 162 of 1955 is directed against the judgement of the Calcutta High Court dated 15-1-1953. C.A. Nos. 38 to 44 of 1956 have been brought against the judgment of Assam High Court dated 2-4-1952. The matters were all heard together in the Assam High Court and were disposed of by one judgment.
(3.) C.A. No. 162 of 1955 relates to the assessment year 1941- 42. The assessee in that case was a-/8/9 annas co-sharer in a zamindari estate known as "Parbatjoar estate" in Assam. The original assessee was Jyotindra Narayan Chowdhury who died on 25-1-1953 and on his death his widow, Shrimati Sindhurani Chowdhurani and others were substituted. The gross agricultural income of the assessee was Rs. 89,633 and income from salami was Rs. 9, 331-9-4 which was received from settlement of 414 different holdings out of which 278 were holding of virgin lands and 136 were those of what are described as auction- purchase lands. Out of the gross income from salami 15 percent has been allowed as collection charges and the amount in dispute in this appeal therefore is Rs. 7, 934. The agricultural Income Tax Officer held this sum to be 'agricultural income' by his order dated 10-11-1941, which was affirmed on appeal to the Assistant Commissioner of Agricultural Income-Tax. The revision taken to the Commissioner under S. 27 of the Act was dismissed but as the instance of the assessee the following two questions were referred for the opinion of the High Court. (1) Whether the single non-recurring premia or salamis paid to the landlord assessee once only as consideration for the settlement of agricultural land at the time of granting a lease can be held to be income within the meaning of the Act (2) Whether single non-recurring premia or salamis paid to the landlord assessee as consideration for the settlement of agricultural land once only at the time of granting lease when such premia or salamis are not dependent on the rate of rent charged, can be held to be income within the meaning of the Act ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.