JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Mr.Gopal Subramanium, learned senior counsel and the learned amicus curiae in this matter, brought to our notice that in continuation of the
motion bench order dated 09.05.2017, by consensus, Mr. V. Ratheesan, IAS,
has been nominated as Executive Officer, and he has assumed charge on
18.06.2017.
(2.) Learned amicus curiae also drew our attention to the immense wealth in the confines and coffers of the temple, and submitted that arrangements
should be made to secure it. Our attention was also drawn to the fact
that there has recently been a theft, and an occurrence of that nature
should not take place again. Only as a suggestion, it was submitted that
the name of Mr.H.Venkatesh, IPS, may be considered as being assigned the
duties of security of the treasures of the temple. It was pointed out
that he has formerly been Commissioner of Police, Thiruvananthapuram and
has experience of serving in the establishment of the Central Bureau of
Investigation. It was submitted that important investigations as in the
Satyam case were also vested with him.
(3.) Mr.Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel representing the State of Kerala did not seriously contest the suggestion made by the learned
amucus curiae. It was, however, submitted that the proper procedure, in
the matter, would be for the State Government to follow the norms and to
constitute a panel of names out of which the one found most suitable by
the Administrative Committee may be assigned the responsibility of
security of the temple.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.