M/S. ARIHANT UDHYOG Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
LAWS(SC)-2017-6-21
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on June 09,2017

M/S. Arihant Udhyog Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

A.K.SIKRI,J. - (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Singular question of law, which is common in all these appeals, that arises for consideration is as to whether the appellants herein who are purchasing the material which is admittedly 'agricultural produce' and bringing the same to the area known as 'market area' and covered by the provisions of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1963 (for short, the 'Rules') are liable to pay the market fee on the said produce. Admittedly, the legal position is that if the agricultural produce is brought to the market area and sold there, market fee is payable thereon. The question in these appeals is as to whether the goods were bought and sold at the market place. The appellants maintain that the sale of the agricultural produce took place and was concluded outside the State of Rajasthan and before these goods were brought to the market area, they had already become the owner thereof by virtue of the sale outside the State and, hence, are not liable to pay any market fee. On the other hand, the respondents, including the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (respondent No.3), argue that the sale was fructified only after the goods were brought to the market area and the ownership in the goods passed from the seller to the appellants herein at that time when the goods were delivered in the market area. On this reckoning, the respondents claim that the market fee is payable by the appellants.
(3.) The appellants had challenged the action of respondent No.3 in demanding the market fee payable under the Rules by filing writ petitions in the High Court. Fifteen such writ petitions were decided by the High Court of Rajasthan vide common judgment dated May 14, 2012 accepting the stand taken by respondent No.3 and it dismissed the writ petitions as bereft of any merit. The writ petitions of other appellants were dismissed by various orders following the said judgment. In view thereof, it would be appropriate to discuss the facts and the reasons given by the High Court for arriving at the said conclusion.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.