KURIAN,J. - (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) In the nature of order we propose to pass in this case, it is not necessary to go into the various submissions made by the learned counsel on both the sides.
(3.) The appellant is aggrieved by the interim order passed by the High Court in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arising out of an interlocutory order passed by the Trial Court. The High Court took note of the fact that Regular Suit No.1563 of 2014 was pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Lucknow and the interlocutory application for temporary injunction in the said suit for permanent injunction had already been fixed for 6.7.2016. In that view of the matter, by the impugned order dated 15.06.2016, the High Court clarified that the possession of the property, allegedly with the respondents, shall not be disturbed. There is a strong dispute now raised by the appellant-Authority that the respondents are not in possession but the possession has long been with the appellant-Authority. Since, the civil suit itself is of the year 2014, we direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow to dispose of the Regular Suit No.1563 of 2014 expeditiously and at any rate within a period of six months from today.;