MUKESH & ANR Vs. STATE FOR NCT OF DELHI & ORS
LAWS(SC)-2017-3-50
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on March 06,2017

Mukesh And Anr Appellant
VERSUS
State For Nct Of Delhi And Ors Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) In pursuance of our order dated 3.2.2017, affidavits on behalf of the petitioners have been filed. Mr. A.P. Singh, learned counsel has filed affidavits on behalf of the three accused persons, namely, Pawan Kumar Gupta, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Kumar Singh and Mr. M.L. Sharma, learned counsel has filed the affidavit on behalf of Mukesh. Be it noted, Mr. A.P. Singh, learned counsel has filed the translated version of the affidavits and Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, learned counsel has filed the original version in Hindi as well as the translated one.
(2.) At this juncture, Mr. Raju Ramachandran, learned senior counsel who has been appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court, submitted that two aspects are required to be further probed to comply with the order dated 3.2.2017 inasmuch as this Court has taken the burden on itself for compliance of Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned senior counsel would point out that the affidavit filed by Mukesh does not cover many aspects, namely, socio-economic background, criminal antecedents, family particulars, personal habits, education, vocational skills, physical health and his conduct in the prison.
(3.) Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, learned counsel submits that a report was asked for from the Superintendent of Jail with regard to the conduct of the accused persons while they are in custody, but the same has not directly been filed by the Superintendent of Jail.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.