CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR FCI AND ORS. Vs. JAGDISH BALARAM BAHIRA AND ORS.
LAWS(SC)-2017-7-2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on July 06,2017

Chairman And Managing Director Fci And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
Jagdish Balaram Bahira And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. - (1.) Delay condoned in SLP (C)...CC No.10889/2015.
(2.) Leave granted in the Special Leave Petitions. A The perspective
(3.) The framers of the Constitution conceived of a policy of affirmative action to redress the social exclusion, economic deprivation and political alienation suffered by historically disadvantaged classes of Indian society. Reservation of posts in public employment and seats for admission in educational institutions and the setting apart of seats in electoral bodies was envisaged by the Constitution for the fulfilment of a constitutional aspiration of social justice to the Scheduled Castes and Tribes and to socially and educationally backward classes of citizens. In pursuit of the constitutional goal of substantive equality, reservations have been envisaged as a means of enabling members of beneficiary groups to realise, in a true sense, dignity, freedom and liberty which the Constitution guarantees as its basic philosophy. But the problem which has confronted legislatures, policy makers as well as courts (as enforcers of the rule of law) is a capture of the benefits of affirmative action programmes by persons who do not genuinely belong to the beneficiary groups. This kind of capture poses a serious dimension. When a person who does not belong to a caste, tribe or class for whom reservation is meant, seeks to pass off as its member, such a stratagem constitutes a fraud on the Constitution. For one thing a person who is disentitled to the benefit of a welfare measure obtains the benefit. For another this deprives a beneficiary who is genuinely entitled to receive those benefits of a legitimate entitlement. This constitutes an egregious constitutional fraud. It is a fraud on the statutes which implement the provisions of the Constitution. It is a fraud on state policy. Confronted with this problem, the legislatures have intervened with statutory instruments while the executive has, in implementation of law, set down administrative parameters and guidelines to prevent the usurpation of benefits.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.