JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The appeal under Section 130E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 seeks to assail an order dated 10.01.2006 passed by the learned Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned Tribunal') by which the orders of the primary and the First Appellate Authority holding the respondent-assessee liable for differential duty to the extent of Rs. 4,79,11,879/- has been reversed.
(2.) Considering the extremely limited scope of an appeal to be heard and considered by this Court under the provisions of 130E(b) of the Customs Act, it will be hardly necessary to embark upon a detailed enumeration of the voluminous facts, figures and materials that have been considered by the authorities at different levels at different points of time. Suffice, it will be to say that orders of the primary and the First Appellate Authority holding the issue against the assessee is primarily founded on the ground that there was a mis-declaration by the assessee with regard to the grade of item(s) imported by the assessee. According to the Revenue, the goods were to be graded only as Grade "A" and "AA" whereas the assessee had graded the goods under the grades A, B and C. As the grading itself found to be inaccurate the transaction value on the basis of such grading was held to be unacceptable. Hence reliance was placed on a standing order dated 04.02.2000 wherein the acceptable value of the like goods are mentioned. The prices mentioned therein were further found to be substantiated by the contemporaneous documents produced by the Revenue in the course of the adjudication.
(3.) In appeal, the learned Tribunal found that the following documents produced by the assessee were not disputed by the Revenue.
i. Contract between the manufacturer and the supplier.
ii. Contract between the supplier and the appellants.
iii Invoice raised by the manufacturer on the supplier
iv. Letter dated 22.12.2000 of the Board of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan, confirming that grades B, C and D also exist.
v. Detailed note/letter of the manufacturer setting out the parameters of grading adopted by the manufacturers of the yarn in question. ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.