BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR
LAWS(SC)-2017-1-89
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on January 20,2017

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Appellant
VERSUS
Cricket Association Of Bihar Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Heard Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General for India, Mr. Gopal Subramaniam and Mr. Anil B. Divan, learned Amicus Curiae, Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi and Mr. Shyam Divan, learned senior counsel for the other contesting parties.
(2.) On 2nd January, 2017, this Court had issued several directions. The relevant directions which need to be reproduced are:- "(vi) This Court shall by a separate order nominate the persons who shall form part of the Committee of administrators. In order to enable the Court to have the benefit of objective assistance in making the nominations, we request Mr Fali S Nariman, learned Senior Counsel and Mr Gopal Subramaniam, the learned Amicus Curiae to assist the Court by suggesting names of persons with integrity and experience in managing a similar enterprise. We request the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties to also place their suggestions before the Court so as to facilitate a considered decision; (vii) In addition to the function assigned in (v) above, the Committee of administrators shall also ensure that the directions contained in the judgment of this Court dated 18 July 2016 (which accepted the report of the Committee with modifications) are fulfilled and to adopt all necessary and consequential steps for that purpose; (viii) In view of the directions contained in (ii) above, the senior most Vice-President of BCCI shall perform the duties of the President, BCCI and the Joint Secretary shall perform the duties of Secretary. Those of the office bearers of BCCI who are not disqualified in terms of clause (i) above (other than the President and Secretary) may continue subject to their filing an unconditional undertaking before this Court within four weeks of the date of this order to abide by and implement the directions contained in the judgment dated 18 July 2016. Upon the Committee of administrators as nominated by this Court assuming charge, the existing office bearers shall function subject to the supervision and control of the Committee of administrators. The Committee of administrators would have the power to issue all appropriate directions to facilitate due supervision and control; and (ix) The remuneration payable to the members of the Committee of Administrators shall be fixed in consultation with the Committee consisting of Mr Justice R M Lodha, Mr Justice Ashok Bhan and Mr Justice R V Raveendran. The role of the Justice R M Lodha Committee shall hereafter be confined to overall policy and direction on such matters as may be referred by this Court. (x) We would request the leaned Senior Counsel and the learned Amicus Curiae to endeavour to submit their suggestions to this Court within two weeks. The proceedings shall be listed before this Court on 19 January 2017 for pronouncement of directions in regard to the names of the administrators."
(3.) Be it noted, there was modification of the order as far as the direction No.(vi) is concerned, and that is instead of Mr. Fali S. Nariman, learned senior counsel, Mr. Anil B. Divan, learned senior counsel, was requested to suggest the names.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.