JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Challenge in this appeal is to the legality of order passed
by a Division Bench of Kerala High Court answering the reference
made to it in favour of the department and against the assessee
appellant.
(3.) Background facts in a nutshell are as follows.
For the assessment year 1992-93, the assessee appellant
had claimed deduction under Section 80-HHC of the Income Tax
Act, 1961, (in short, 'the Act'). The assessing officer disallowed the
claim on the ground that the 'profits of the business' computed
under Section 80-HHC indicated a negative figure. An appeal was
preferred before Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), Cochin
Bench, hereinafter, referred to as 'the CIT(A)'. The said appellate
authority also was of the same view and dismissed the appeal. The
assessee appellant preferred an appeal before the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, in short 'the ITAT'. By Order
dated 14th September, 1995 in ITA No. 498 (Coch)/1995, the view of
the assessing officer as well as of CIT(A) was affirmed. On being
moved for reference, ITAT referred the following questions for
adjudication by the High Court:
"(1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of
the case, the Tribunal was justified in entertaining
the additional ground raised by the assessee on an
issue which had not been disputed earlier before the
assessing officer or the first appellate authority
(2) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of
the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that
the payment received from the export houses under
the agreements could not partake the nature of
receipt towards "charges" mentioned in clause (baa) of
Explanation to Sec.80HHC
(3) Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, and on an interpretation of
Sec. 8OHHC(3) would the assessee be entitled to the
deduction in an amount equal to 90% of the sums
referred to in clause (iiia) (not being profits on sale of
a licence acquired from any other person) and clause
(iiib) and clause (iiic) of section 28, the same
proportion as the export turnover bears to the total
turnover to the business carried on by the assessee
(4) Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in its
interpretation of the term 'profits of business'
(5) Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to
the benefits of sec. 80HHC of the Income Tax Act ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.