JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Challenge in these appeals is to the order passed by a
Division Bench of the Patna High Court giving certain
directions in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the
respondent no.1. The prayer in the writ petition was
essentially to direct the officials "to stop criminal events
against the shopkeepers, dealers, artisans and industrial and
industrial units and labourers and industrial units and also to
stop their exploitation by the officers and police personnel."
(3.) The basic grievance was that officials in the police
department were continued at one particular station for long
period which is undesirable. The High Court disposed of the
writ petition inter-alia with the following directions and
observations:
(a) Let the Director General Police make out a list
of officers from the station House Officer up to
the Additional Director General of Police, of
whose who have remained in their station for
more than four years. This dossier is to be
supported with information from service record
as to which officer throughout their career has
remained at which station and for how long.
Officers who have remained at one station for
over four years must see a posting out within
six weeks from today. These would be officers
below the rank of Inspector General of Police.
Staff below the SHOs who have remained at a
particular station beyond three years will be
identified by the District heads of police
concerned and their movement will be
undertaken by the Director General of Police.
It must be mentioned that the period of
four years is set because in the normal course
of government service, transfers and postings
are made for officers if they have been at a
particular posting for more than three years.
This order obviously does not preclude the
Director General of Police from making any
transfers should an officer have been at a
posting for a lesser period, which is within
normal administrative powers.
(b) On the monitoring of crime which the law
obliges the state to register the court suggests
the following measure:-
The State of Bihar will request the
National Informatics Centre, Government of
India, State unit, to make out a blue print for
monitoring the recording of a First Information
Report, whether it is registered as an FIR or an
entry in the General Diary. Every such record
in continuation of the orders of the court dated
5 August, 2003 will be transmitted by the
police stations concerned to the district police
officer, whether the Superintendent of Police or
the Senior Superintendent of Police. This will
create a data-base at the district police
headquarters. A summary of the FIR or the
General Diary containing the offences and the
person's name will be transmitted to the
District Judgeships (District and Sessions
Judge). A periodical report, as the police
regulations so require, will also be given on the
progress and action taken on a reported crime,
whether it has culminated in a final report to
be filed or a charge sheet to be filed before the
Magistrate concerned.
If common name is occurring of an
accused in more than one district, this
information will be shared between the police
officers who are heads of the districts
concerned and intimated to the police
headquarters and in terms of the order dated
August 5, 2003, as also to the district
judgeship.
The National Informatics Centre (NIC) will
also draw up a plan (reference orders of the
Court dated August 5 and this order) how an
FIR may be recorded by computer by the
SP/SSP/CJM on the failure of the police
station to record it, and to create a data base
on crime and criminals in the State.
Report to be submitted by the NIC to the
Director General of Police for due action on it
by the State Government, and the High Court
to be informed on the report and progress on
it.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.