JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These appeals preferred under Section 35L(b) of the
Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Act') are directed against a common order dated
22.12.2004 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'CESTAT')
West Regional Bench, Mumbai by which Appeal Nos.
E/304/2004, E/314/2004 and E/315/2004 filed by the
respondent-assessee were allowed.
(2.) The facts briefly stated are as follows:
(3.) The respondents - M/s. Danmet Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
(hereinafter referred to as 'DCPL') were manufacturing the
products 'CRC 2-26 Aerosol' and 'CRC Acryform Aerosol'
since 1983. They were claiming exemption under
Notification No. 120/84-CE dated 11.5.1984 for the product
'CRC 2-26' and SSI exemption under Notification No.
175/86-CE dated 1.3.1986 for the product 'CRC Acryform'.
In their declarations they claimed the classification of the
products 'CRC 2-26' under Chapter 2710.99 and 'CRC
Acryform' under Chapter 3203.40.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.