GOMTI Vs. THAKURDAS
LAWS(SC)-2007-4-84
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ALLAHABAD)
Decided on April 13,2007

GOMTI Appellant
VERSUS
THAKURDAS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J. - (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Challenge in this appeal is to the orders passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court accepting prayer for bail, which has been filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 5, during pendency of the appeals (i.e. CRLA 3876/2002 and 3777/2002) before the High Court. The present appeal is by the complainant alleging that her husband has been killed by the respondents 1 to 5 on 12.9.1998, and the concerned respondents are not entitled to bail. 2-A. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows : The respondent Nos. 1 to 5 faced trial of alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 201, 120-B and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC) and under Sections 3(2) and (5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (in short the SCST Act) and Sections 3(2) and (5) of the Arms Act, 1954 (in short the Arms Act) in Sessions Trial Nos. 11 and 12 of 1999.
(3.) All the accused were found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment for life and were convicted in terms of Section 302 read with Section 149, IPC, and other sentences in respect of Sections 148, 201 and Section 3(2) and (5) of the SCST Act. However, they were acquitted of the charges relatable to Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 120-B, IPC. The respondents 1 to 5 filed Criminal Appeal Nos. 3876 of 2002 and 3777 of 2002 before the High Court. By the impugned orders dated 16.12.2002 and 23.1.2003, the prayer for bail was accepted. In the Criminal Appeal No. 3876 of 2002 the following order was passed. "Heard learned counsel for the appellants Sri Sanjay Tripathi for complainant and the learned A.G.A. Perused the order of Sessions Judge and lower courts record. The appellants were on bail during trial. Pending appeal, appellants-Thakur Das, Hanshraj and Dillan convicted in S.T. No. 12/99 shall be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. Until further orders realisation of fine shall also remain stayed." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.