JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) This appeal preferred by the Union of India is
directed against the judgment and order dated 26.5.2006 of
the High Court of Delhi in Arbitration Petition No. 213 of 2006.
By the aforesaid order the High Court appointed an arbitrator
on a petition filed by the respondent under Section 11(6) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 'the Act').
(3.) To answer the question involved in this appeal, it
may not be necessary to delve the entire facts leading to the
filing of the present appeal. Suffice it say that in response to
an invitation to tender inquiry No. A.M-5/RC-14100105/
072003/ WT/ BTYS/ Defence/ 2003-04/ 75 for supply of
battery secondary lead acid, an offer dated 7.10.2002 was
submitted which was revised by letter dated 8.4.2003. On the
basis of the revised offer dated 8.4.2003 a rate contract No.
AM-5/RC-14100105/ 072003/ WT/ BTYS/ DEF/ 2003-04/
75/ BHARAT/ COAC/ 185 dated 5.5.2003 for the period
5.5.2003 to 16.3.2004 was executed between the appellant
and the respondent.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.