SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION GENERAL HYDERABAD Vs. B CHANDRA REDDY
LAWS(SC)-2007-4-53
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ANDHRA PRADESH)
Decided on April 16,2007

SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION), GENERAL, HYDERABAD Appellant
VERSUS
B. CHANDRA REDDY Respondents

JUDGEMENT

C. K. Thakker, J. - (1.) Present appeals are filed against the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on April 12, 1999 in Writ Appeal M.P. No. 1001 of 1995 and W.A.S.R. No. 38345 of 1995 by which it confirmed the order passed by the learned Single Judge on January 27, 1995 in Writ Petition No.12016 of 1993 directing the appellant herein to comply with the award passed by an Arbitrator appointed under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act of 1952 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").
(2.) The facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the respondents-claimants were the owners of the land bearing Survey No. 83 admeasuring 12 acres and 5 gunthas and Survey No. 86/2 admeasuring 12 acres and 30 guntas, situated at Devarayamzal Village, Medchal Mandal, Rangareddy District of Andhra Pradesh. The land was initially requisitioned for defence purpose, i.e. for the purpose of extension of rifle range of Hakimpet Airfield, EMC Centre, Secundera-bad. The Competent Authority thereafter initiated proceedings for acquisition of land and by an award dated February 6, 1978, offered compensation to the respondents-land-owners at the rate of Rs. 4000/- per acre. The respondents-land-owners did not accept the amount of compensation as offered by the Competent Authority under the Act and the case was referred to an Arbitrator under the Act. Arbitration Case No. 1 of 1988 was registered. The parties were granted an opportunity to adduce evidence and finally by an award dated November 13, 1991, the learned Arbitrator awarded an amount of Rs. 9000/- per acre to the land-owners. Over and above the amount of compensation, the Arbitrator also awarded solatium @ 30% per annum and interest @ 6% per annum. The amount was not paid by the appellant to the claimants. The claimants, in the circumstances, were constrained to approach the High Court by filing Writ Petition No. 12016 of 1993 for issuing appropriate directions to the authorities to pay the amount awarded by the Arbitrator. By an order dated January 27, 1995, a Single Judge of the High Court issued necessary directions as prayed by the claimants and ordered the authorities to pay the amount within sixty days. Writ Appeal filed by the appellant before the Division Bench of the High Court was dismissed on the ground of delay as also on merits. The said decision has been challenged by the appellant in this Court.
(3.) On February 14, 2000, when the matter was placed for admission-hearing, a two-Judge Bench issued notice limited to solatium and interest and the following order was passed- "Issue notice on SLP restricted to solatium and interest. Notice will also issue on application for condonation of delay. Ld. counsel is permitted to file a copy of grounds of appeal in the CMA which is pending in the High Court. There is no stay in respect of the other amount covered by the award." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.