JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the
Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court
dismissing the appeal filed by the accused-appellants. Three
accused persons faced trial for alleged commission of offence
punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') for causing
homicidal death of Jagbir (hereinafter referred to as the
'deceased'). They were convicted by Additional Sessions Judge
(First), Bhiwani, Haryana and each was sentenced to undergo
imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- with
default stipulation.
(3.) Prosecution version sans unnecessary details is as
follows:
The accused and the deceased are residents of village
Dhanana. Mst. Bhulan had a son, namely, Jagbir, the
deceased, and a daughter, namely, Krishna. Both were
married. On account of floods in the village, 15 days prior to
the occurrence, Prem, wife of Jagbir had gone to her parental
house. Due to floods in the streets of the village, Mst. Bhulan
the complainant used to tether her cattle near Dharmashala
Brahmchari Ashram and Jagbir used to sleep near the cattle.
On 24.9.1995, at about 9/9.30 P.M., after taking meals, as
usual Jagbir went to the sitting room of accused Silak Ram
son of Ram Bhagat where Narotam alias Raja, Silak Ram and
Bijender alias Binder i.e. all the three accused were present.
During conversation Jagbir told one Narender who was
present there that Bijender Singh alias Binder was a cheap
person and he could commit crime at any time. Narotam had
also quarreled with Jagbir 15-20 days prior to the occurrence
over the turmoil created by buffalo of the former. There was
exchange of hot words between them and Jagbir, which
attracted Mst. Bhulan. She intervened and brought her son
back to the house and directed him to sleep aside the cattle.
Mst. Bhulan in her statement further submitted that during
night when she woke up to urinate, she heard cries of her son
and, therefore, she ran towards Brahmchari Ashram where
her son was sleeping. Chater Singh (her husband's brother)
and his son Ved Parkash also ran towards that side. They saw
in the light of Brahmchari Ashram that accused Narotam alias
Raja armed with gandasi, Bijjender alias Binder armed with
'phali' and Silak Ram armed with lathi were causing injuries to
Jagbir. In their presence, Narotam alias Raja gave gandasi
blow on the right temporal region of Jasbir, Bijender alias
Binder gave phali blow on the right side of his chest and Silak
Ram also gave lathi blow to him. On seeing the witnesses, the
accused ran away from the spot. When they reached near
Jagbir, then they saw that he had breathed his last. Due to
the flood water in the village and in the surrounding areas of
the village and also on account of fear, they could not go to the
Police Station immediately.
Ultimately, when they were going to lodge the report, ASI
Nar Singh met Mst. Bhulan at the crossing of village Mandhal
where she got recorded her statement (Ex. P.A.) which was
completed at 9.40 A.M. on 25.9.1995, on the basis of which
FIR was recorded at the Police Station, Bhiwani Khera, on the
same day at 11.00 A.M. Special report was sent by SI Darshan
Lal through Constable Devinder Kumar No.579 to the Illaqa
Magistrate which was received by him on the same day at 7.00
P.M. The distance between the place of occurance and the
police station is 21 Kms. After sending ruqa, SI Darshan Lal
proceeded for the village, got the dead body photographed,
prepared inquest report, lifted bloodstained earth, a pair of
chappel and some pieces of rori on which he had noticed
blood. He also took into possession string of cot stained with
human blood. He also took into possession bloodstains from
thresher, trolley and took the same into possession vide
different memos. He also prepared rough site plan of the place
of occurrence and recorded statement of the witnesses. He
also got conducted autopsy on the dead body of Jagbir. On
30.5.1995, he arrested the accused from the bus stand of
village Dhanana. He got recovered the lathi, shirt-pajjama
from the room of a house in pursuance of the disclosure
statement made by the accused Silak Ram.
Similarly, in pursuance of the disclosure statement made
by accused Bijender alias Binder, he got recovered phalli, the
weapon of offence and the clothes from the different places
and took the same into possession.
He also got recovered gandasi under a heap of dung from
some inhabited place, shirt and pajama from different places
in pursuance to the disclosure statement made by Narotam
and took the same into possession through different parcels.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.