SHRISTI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD Vs. SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD
LAWS(SC)-2007-3-135
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: CALCUTTA)
Decided on March 12,2007

SHRISTI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Appellant
VERSUS
SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This is an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and relates to a dispute under an agreement between a foreign company and an Indian company. The application is filed by an Indian company against the foreign company seeking reference of the disputes to an arbitrator. The claim of the petitioner is that the respondent-company is liable to pay the petitioner a sum of Rs.98,72,68,531.00 as per Annexure P/1 with interest at the rate of 21% per annum; the petitioner is entitled to interest pendente lite and future interest on the amount claimed from the date of the petitioner invoking arbitration till the date of decree by a Competent Forum at 21% per annum and cost of arbitration from the respondent-company.
(2.) The relevant facts set out in the petition by the petitioner are as follows:- The petitioner is a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at New Delhi. The respondent-company is registered and incorporated in Malaysia as per Malaysian Laws and it has its principal place of business at Level 8, Mentara Sunway, Jalan Lagoon Timur, Bandor Sunway, 46150 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. It has its office at New Delhi and it is carrying contract work for constructing, rehabilitation and up-gradation of NH-25 to Four Lane configuration in the State of Uttar Pradesh, being a part of East West Corridor Project (EWC Project) on the terms and conditions contained in the Letter of Acceptance dated 30th June, 2005 issued by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The said Project is funded by International Lending Agency and is being executed with funds from Asian Development Bank.
(3.) On 19.11.2005, the petitioner entered into a contract with the respondent-company for construction of one-third portion of the above-mentioned stretch of the NH from 143.6 Kms to 170 Kms. The total value of this sub-contract is to the tune of Rs.134,37,91,938/-. Three separate agreements were entered into between the parties herein on 22.12.2005. On 29.11.2005, the petitioner furnished Performance Bank Guarantee to the respondent-company in the sum of Rs.6,71,89,597/- which was valid till 30.04.2009. The petitioner also furnished mobilization advance Bank Guarantee to the respondent-company in the sum of Rs.6,71,89,597/- on 16.12.2005, which was valid till 30.04.2009. In December 2005, the petitioner mobilized its resources to commence the work at site. It is stated that on 04.03.2006, the respondent-company belatedly released Rs.6,09,72,130/- as mobilization advance to the petitioner. Apart from the financial crunch, the petitioner faced several difficulties and hindrances in the execution of the contract which was duly intimated to the respondent-company, but to no avail.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.