STATE OF TAMIL NADU Vs. SIVARASAN ALIAS RAGHU ALIAS SIVARASA
LAWS(SC)-1996-10-201
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADRAS)
Decided on October 31,1996

STATE OF TAMIL NADU Appellant
VERSUS
Sivarasan Alias Raghu Alias Sivarasa Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of the Principal Sessions Judge and Designated court, Coimbatore, in CC No. 61 of 1992. As the learned Judge acquitted the accused, the State has filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the "tada Act").
(2.) The prosecution case is that Sivarajan alias Raghu (Respondent/accused 1 and Vigneswaran alias Vicky (Respondent/accused 2 who were Sri Lankan nationals and members of LTTE came to India sometime in 1989 without any travelling documents. So also, Guna and Dixon who were Sri Lankan nationals and members of LTTE had come to India in the like manner. Since then they were engaged in obtaining explosive substances, manufacturing bombs and sending them to LTTE in Sri Lanka. In the said clandestine activity they were helped and assisted by Respondents 3 to 9 (Accused 3 to 9 who are Indian nationals. Till the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi on 21/5/1991, they could carry on the said activity without any hindrance. Thereafter it became difficult for them to do so as the whole of Tamil Nadu was declared as a notified area with effect from 23/6/1991, under Section 2 (1) (f) of the TADA Act and also because the government of India and the government of Tamil Nadu tightened security measures within the State of Tamil Nadu. The police was also on the look out for Sri Lankans who did not possess passport and visa for staying in India and had also required the houseowners to report to it if such Sri Lankans were found to be occupying their houses. Due to such strict measures A-1, A-2, Guna and Dixon found it difficult to obtain accommodation for their residence and for manufacturing bombs and storing them and, therefore, they went on changing houses after taking them on rent by making misrepresentations. Since February 1991 A-1 and Guna had taken on rent one house bearing Door No. 11/12-A situated in Shivaji Colony in Coimbatore. Dixon and others were occupying a different house in Coimbatore. As the LTTE was in desperate need of hand grenades and bombs and wanted them to be supplied latest by the end of first week of August 1991, A-l to A-5 and A-7 to A-9 and Guna met at the house of A-1 in Shivaji Colony and decided to manufacture and send them to Sri Lanka and also to strike terror in the people by using bombs or other explosives and thereby causing damage to Indian property or death or injuries to Indian leaders and other persons if they came in their way. All the nine accused along with Guna and Dixon continued to manufacture different parts of hand grenades and plastic bombs and store them at different places. A-1 and A-2 were required to change their residence from Shivaji Colony to a house in Dr Muthuswamy Colony as theowner of the house objected to their suspicious activities. On 28/7/1991, A-1and A-2 after making necessary arrangements for transporting the hand grenades and plastic bombs manufactured by them with the help of other a accused and which were to be filled with explosives at Trichy returned to the house in Dr Muthuswamy Colony. They found police standing near their house. So they went to another house where some more articles were kept. There they came to know that Guna and Dixon had committed suicide as the police had surrounded their house.
(3.) In the evening A-1 and A-2 were going on a Kinetic Honda scooter. Public Witness 1 Pandurangan, a traffic police constable signalled them to stop as he noticed that the scooter was being driven very fast. Instead of stopping the scooter, A-1 who was driving it, attempted to dash it against him. Public Witness I jumped aside and saved himself. After covering some distance A-1 and A-2 fell down on the road along with the scooter. Public Witness I then went to that place and asked A-1 to show his licence. A-1 challenged him by saying as who he was to ask for a licence. A-1 then said "if this policeman is done away with, this Police Department will then understand". He also threatened Public Witness I by staling that if he tried to catch him, beat him or send him out of the country he would destroy the entire Tamil Nadu. Public Witness I suspecting them to be ltte terrorists, shouted for help and blew his whistle. Thereupon A-1 attempted to start the scooter but it did not start. Hearing the shouts and the whistle two police constables, Sivagnanam and Public Witness 2 Devasayayam came there. The three police constables with the help of other persons tried to take both the accused in custody. At that time A-1 took out a cyanide capsule from his pant pocket and attempted to put it in his mouth. Public Witness I pushed his hand aside and the capsule fell down on the road. The police constables then took both the accused to Thoodivalur Police Station. There Public Witness I lodged a complaint against them under S. 353, 307 and 309 Indian Penal Code. On the basis of this complaint Inspector Angamuthu, Public Witness 55 started the investigation. On the basis of further information other charges under the TADA Act and Explosive Substances Act, 1908 were also added. During the investigation various incriminating articles like incomplete grenades or bombs or their parts and the vehicles used in transporting the same were discovered at the instance of the accused or were recovered from their possession.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.