M M RUBBER COMPANY LIMITED Vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE MADRAS
LAWS(SC)-1996-8-100
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on August 01,1996

M M RUBBER COMPANY LIMITED Appellant
VERSUS
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE MADRAS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) It is not necessary to go into the history of the proceedings that led to the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate tribunal which is under appeal. It is sufficient to say that the tribunal upheld the classification of pillion seats for scooters, driver and passenger seats for autorickshaws and seats for tractors and jeeps as "latex foam sponge" falling under Item 16-A (i) of the central Excise Tariff and rejected the contention of the appellants that the seats should be classified under Item 34-A.
(2.) Item 16-A (;) , at the relevant time, read thus: "16-A. Rubber products, the following, namely: (i) Latex foam sponge 60% ad valorem" with effect from 1/3/1982, an explanation was introduced in Item 16-A (i) to include articles made of latex foam sponge. Tariff Item 34-A reads thus: "34-A. Parts and accessories of 20 per cent ad valorem. motor vehicles not otherwise specified Explanation.-the expression 'motor vehicles' has the meaning assigned to it in Item 34. "
(3.) The tribunal, in the order under appeal, found that there was no transformation of the liquid froth foam sponge. It merely took the shape of the mould into which it was poured. Referring to the judgment of this court in Ami Glass Industries (P) Ltd. v. CCE, the tribunal stated that the functional aspect referred to therein had no significance in the case before it because the functional use of a mirror was totally different from the functional use of glass (which was the subject-matter of the case of Atul Glass Industries'). In the instant case, although the latex foam sponge had acquired the shape of a seat, it had not, unlike in the case of the glass mirror, undergone such a complete or considerable transformation that the moulded product no longer was identifiable as latex foam sponge. It continued to be sponge moulded into a particular, desired shape. Further, there was no item more specific than "latex foam sponge" to cover the moulded goods. Emphasis was also laid upon the fact that the seats had not been fabricated from out of bigger pieces of sponge.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.