JUDGEMENT
Ranganath Misra, J. -
(1.) By these applications under Art. 32 of the Constitution Common Cause, a registered Society and three retired Government servants have asked for striking down certain provisions of the Commutation of Pension Rules applicable to civilian and defence pensioners as they permit the Union of India to recover more than what is paid to the pensioners upon commutation and for a direction that an appropriate scheme rationalising the provisions relating to commutation be brought into force. The respondent has filed a counter-affidavit challenging the maintainability of the petition as also the claim of the petitioners and the matter has been heard at considerable length from time to time. Parties have filed written submissions supplementing their oral arguments.
(2.) The Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 are the appropriate rules in force so far as civilian employees under the Government of India are concerned. A set of regulations is in force in regard to Defence personnel.
(3.) It is not disputed that in the case of civilians the total amount of pension which can be commuted is up to one-third while in the case of Defence personnel, commutation is admissible up to 43 per cent in the case of officers and up to 45 per cent in respect of other ranks. The argument advanced on behalf of the petitioners that there has been a substantial improvement in the life expectancy of the people in India has not been refuted on behalf of the respondent. This Court suggested to the respondent in course of the hearing that in the changed situation now prevailing in the country, a new look should be given to the matter. In deference to the suggestion made by this Court, the respondent took time to consider the various aspects raised in the writ petitions and the oral submissions advanced at the hearing as also the written notes submitted in Court. It also took into account the fact that several State Governments have changed the rule applicable to commutation and have restored full pension to the pensioners who commuted a part of their pension after lapse of fifteen years. Union of India has now agreed to restore the commuted portion of the pension in regard to all civilian employees at the age of seventy years or after fifteen years whichever is later, and has agreed to make this effective from April 1, 1986. This decision of the respondent was communicated to the learned Attorney General by a letter dated 20-3-1986 reading thus:
"I am glad to inform you that Government have taken a decision in the matter of recovery from pension towards commuted value of pension. The decision is as follows:
(i) Recovery from pension payable every month towards commuted value of pension will stop on the completion of 15 years from the date of retirement on superannuation or on the pensioner completing the age of 70 years, whichever is later.
(ii) The formulation will apply to all civilian pensioners in whose ease the age of retirement on superannuation is 58 years and the personnel of Armed Forces in whose case the retirement age varies in accordance with the colour service prescribed for the rank (attaining the age of 37/38 years or more).
(iii) Government have taken this decision as an act of goodwill to pensioners and to extend to them some measure of relief in the evening of their lives. It is sincerely believed that there will be no further demand on this issue and that the pensioners will accept the decision of the Government without dissent or reservation.
(iv) The decision will take effect prospectively (from April 1, 1986)."
A distinction has been made in the case of Defence employees on the ground that retirement in their case is at an early age and merely with lapse of a period of fifteen years full pension could not be restored. It has also been pointed out that the Defence personnel receive in consideration of the exigencies of the service a higher rate of pension as compared to civilian employees.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.